Search for: "Dan Farber" Results 81 - 100 of 196
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2015, 6:46 pm by Bridget Crawford
Dempsey m2dempsey Villanova Stephen Diamond StephenFDiamond Santa Clara Darby Dickerson darbydickerson Texas Tech Amy Dillard adillard Baltimore Jim Dimitri profdimitri Indiana John DiPippa jmdipippa Arkansas-Little Rock Scott Dodson ProfDodson Hastings Randy Dryer medialawguy Utah Mary Dudziak marydudziak Emory Joel Eisen joeleisen Richmond Atiba Ellis atibaellis West Virginia Mairead Enright maireadenright Kent (UK) Jonathan Ezor ProfJonathan Touro Dave Fagundes Dave_Fagundes Soutwestern Joshua… [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 1:11 am
Contents include:EditorialThijs Etty, Veerle Heyvaert, Cinnamon Carlarne, Dan Farber, Jolene Lin & Joanne Scott, Pursuing Transnational Policy Change ArticlesSean Stephenson, Arne Mooers & Amir Attaran, Does Size Matter? [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
A few months ago, I wrote about an effort by the California legislature to undo an unwise (but duly enacted) voter initiative involving immigration policy. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:08 pm by berklawnews
Daniel Farber quoted in Greenwire, July 24, 2014 Dan Farber … said an argument seeking to undermine the regulations because of the two versions of Section 111(d) has a “gotcha quality” that he expects will fail. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 2:02 pm by Glenn Reynolds
By the way, I highly recommend Dan Farber’s excellent short essay, Terminator 2 1/2: The Constitution in an Alternate World. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:21 am
 For other views see these posts on the Legal Planet blog by Richard Frank, Dan Farber, and Rhead Enion. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm by berklawnews
Daniel Farber quoted in The Washington Post, May 1, 2014 Among those who first pointed out the problem were law professors Jonathan Adler of Case Western Reserve University and Dan Farber of the University of California at Berkeley. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 11:37 am by Megan Herzog
The Top 10 Reasons Why EPA’s Powerplant Rule is like Obamacare (Dan Farber) – A list of similarities between EPA’s proposed rule and Obamacare. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 7:11 am
 University of Berkeley law professor Dan Farber, for example, clearly shares Mann’s view of climate science and the urgency of climate change as a problem, but he nonetheless thinks Mann should lose his suit. [read post]
2 May 2014, 11:56 am by Grant MacIntyre
by Grant MacIntyre On May 1, 2014, Bracewell partner Jeff Holmstead was interviewed in a live on-air chat by the Huffington Post, along with John Walke of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and law professor Dan Farber of the University of California at Berkeley. [read post]
2 May 2014, 3:00 am by Scott Bomboy
Fellow law professors Jon Adler and Dan Farber also discussed the mistaken passage online, which led to more coverage from writers on the Supreme Court beat. [read post]
1 May 2014, 5:26 pm
Beutler goes on to quote Berkeley’s Dan Farber, who characterizes the mistake properly, but Beutler’s set up is wrong. [read post]
1 May 2014, 11:31 am by Tom Smith
“Scalia’s dissent … contains a hugely embarrassing mistake,” wrote University of California-Berkeley law professor Dan Farber. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:35 am by Lawrence Solum
 Here is the abstract: In Desperately Seeking Certainty (co-authored with Dan Farber), I demonstrated the inherent futility of the search for grand unified theories of constitutional law. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 5:28 am
For additional perspectives and background on the case, see these posts at Legal Planet by Dan Farber, Ann Carlson, and Richard Frank. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 12:49 pm by Ken White
In this I agree with Jonathan Adler and Dan Farber. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 8:48 am by Richard Frank
Legal Planet colleagues Ann Carlson and Dan Farber have already posted their thoughts on the case. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 10:39 am by Jonathan H. Adler
 Berkeley’s Dan Farber, who is undoubtedly less sympathetic to the defendants than am I, likewise believes the comments at issue were protected speech. [read post]