Search for: "Dan Farber"
Results 161 - 180
of 204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2007, 11:19 am
Tom Foremski, Mike at TechDirt, and Dan Farber reported on the Tech Policy Summit this morning with some laments. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 12:49 pm
In this I agree with Jonathan Adler and Dan Farber. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 7:59 pm
- Farber on Preemption. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 8:29 pm
Furthermore, application of a property rights framework, in my view, supports claims for compensation, as suggested by the work of Dan Farber (among others), as well as calls for the imposition of a fully-rebated, revenue-neutral carbon tax – what could be conceived as an atmospheric user fee. [read post]
1 May 2014, 5:26 pm
Beutler goes on to quote Berkeley’s Dan Farber, who characterizes the mistake properly, but Beutler’s set up is wrong. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 6:48 am
EPA, see Dan Farber's comments on Legal Planet.] [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 6:50 am
Mon, 10/24 Andrea Katz Tue, 10/25 Rick Pildes Wed, 10/26 Carlos Ball Thurs, 10/27 Victoria Nourse Fri, 10/28 Keith Whittington Mon, 10/31 Lisa Heinzerling Tue, 11/1 Glen Staszewski Wed, 11/2 Chris Walker Thurs, 11/3 Dan Farber Fri, 11/4 Gillian Metzger Mon, 11/7 Cristina Rodriguez Tue, 11/8 Michael Sant’Ambrogio Wed, 11/9 Ilya Somin Thurs, 11/10 Bijal Shah Fri, 11/11 Blake Emerson Andrea Scoseria Katz is Associate… [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 7:11 am
University of Berkeley law professor Dan Farber, for example, clearly shares Mann’s view of climate science and the urgency of climate change as a problem, but he nonetheless thinks Mann should lose his suit. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
It’s a bike ride across Massachusetts to raise money in the fight against cancer. 100% of your contribution goes to the Dan-Farber Cancer Institute. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 7:42 am
(Legal Planet colleague Dan Farber analyzes these two pending cases in more detail in an excellent, recent post.) [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 10:30 am
The medical center is clinically affiliated with the Joslin Diabetes Center and is a founding member of the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:37 am
” To borrow from Dan Farber and Anne Joseph O’Connell, Justice Kagan’s reference to administrative law judges (ALJs) indicates the “lost world” of agency adjudication—the formal adjudication set forth in the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) that then-Professor Kagan no doubt taught in her administrative law classes. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm
Interesting research by Dan Farber shows that when the U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:15 am
Dan Farber at the Berkley/UCLA Legal Planet blog notes that the Court’s punting of the jurisdictional question and then decision on the merits was unusual and that the Court should simply have dismissed certiorari as improvidently granted rather than rule on the merits. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 6:46 pm
Dempsey m2dempsey Villanova Stephen Diamond StephenFDiamond Santa Clara Darby Dickerson darbydickerson Texas Tech Amy Dillard adillard Baltimore Jim Dimitri profdimitri Indiana John DiPippa jmdipippa Arkansas-Little Rock Scott Dodson ProfDodson Hastings Randy Dryer medialawguy Utah Mary Dudziak marydudziak Emory Joel Eisen joeleisen Richmond Atiba Ellis atibaellis West Virginia Mairead Enright maireadenright Kent (UK) Jonathan Ezor ProfJonathan Touro Dave Fagundes Dave_Fagundes Soutwestern Joshua… [read post]
9 Sep 2007, 11:33 am
Farber, Toward a New Legal Realism, 68 U. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 11:14 pm
Farber, Toward a New Legal Realism, 68 U. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 5:14 pm
Here I want to post a letter that UC Berkeley Law Professor Dan Farber and I sent to Representative Slaughter, Chair of the House Rules Committee, back when the self-executing-rule option was still on the table. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 7:16 pm
Farber, Toward a New Legal Realism, 68 U. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
On the other hand, I am quite taken with Professor Dan Farber’s appealing suggestion that the major questions doctrine should be viewed not as doing the work of the nondelegation doctrine, but as guarding against the potential that presidents might exercise powers not actually sanctioned in law. [read post]
