Search for: "Dan Tench" Results 21 - 40 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2019, 4:26 am by CMS
Omar Qureshi, Dan Tench and Cathryn Hopkins of CMS comment on the decision which was handed down on 15 May 2019 by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal and others [2019] UKSC 22:  On 15 May 2019, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment, deciding by a slim majority of 4:3 that an “ouster clause” in section 67(8) of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (“RIPA”)… [read post]
16 May 2015, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
In Kerner v (1) WX (2) YZ (Persons Unknown), Mr Justice Warby has continued an harassment injunction and ordered disclosure against the DVLA so that the claimants can obtain details which may track down the respondents, a photographer and his associate. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:30 am by INFORRM
Dan Tench is a partner in the Litigation Department at Olswang LLP Olswang acted for Interveners, English PEN, Article 19 and Index on Censorship, at the Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
On 12 February 2020 the Government published its initial response (the “Response”) to last year’s Online Harms White Paper consultation. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 5:02 am by INFORRM
The decision of Mr Justice Peter Smith in Sports Direct International plc v Rangers International Football Club plc and another [2016] EWHC 85 (Ch) to refuse to commit the respondent for contempt for alleged breach of an injunction shows the caution that the court will sometimes show when it comes to seeking to enforce injunctive relief. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
In Cheshire West and Chester Council and others v Pickthall, [2015] EWHC 2141 (QB) Mr Justice Edis granted an interim injunction under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (the “PHA”) to restrain the defendant from publishing allegations of criminal conduct on the part of the claimant Council and various individuals associated with it. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Dan Tench, Emma Boffey, Graeme MacLeod and Jo Clark are solicitors at CMS This post originally appeared on the CMS Law-Now website and is reproduced with permission and thanks [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm by INFORRM
On 15 May 2019, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the case of R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal ([2019] UKSC 22), deciding by a slim majority of 4:3 that an “ouster clause” in section 67(8) of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (“RIPA”) that purports to exclude from challenge or appeal any decision of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (“IPT”), does not prevent a judicial review challenge based… [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
In the case of R (Ingenious Media) v HMRC ([2016] UKSC 54) UK Supreme Court held that information provided by taxpayers to HMRC is confidential and that HMRC acted unlawfully by disclosing such information to journalists. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 4:57 am by CMS
The UKSC Blog was conceived in 2009 by two individuals: Hugh Tomlinson QC of Matrix Chambers and Dan Tench, partner at CMS. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 4:26 am
Dan Tench, of Olswang, the law firm representing Gentoo, said: "This case illustrates an increasingly important legal issue: proving who is responsible for the publication of anonymous material on the internet. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 7:21 am by charonqc
I’m not so sure they do to the extent that Dan Tench, impliedly, supposes. [read post]
2 May 2010, 9:31 am by INFORRM
   It has recently been recognised as being an aspect of the Article 10 right to freedom of expression (last year in the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union case Tarsasag a Szabadsagjogokert v Hungary) and even more recently by the English Courts (this year in A v Independent News & Media Limited & Ors [2010] EWCA 343, discussed on this blog by Dan Tench). [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 5:52 am by Blog Editorial
There was an Inforrm’s Blog post about the Court of Appeal decision in which Olswang’s Dan Tench expressed “shock and disbelief” at the Court of Appeal decision. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
 They were as follows: Case Law: OPO v MLA, Shock and disbelief at the Court of Appeal – Dan Tench The Perils of “Revenge Porn” – Alex Cochrane Will the tort of misuse of private information disappear if the Human Rights Act is repealed? [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
” For further information – and if you want to join the action – Dan Tench can be contacted by email at daniel.tench@olswang.com. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 10:06 pm by charonqc
Dan Tench writes: “In her conclusion, Lady Hale regrets that the Act “has given rise to so many difficult constitutional issues”, although that was perhaps inevitable. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
The details of the judgment are discussed by my colleague Dan Tench here. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 6:02 am by INFORRM
  They were, in descending order: Case Law: OPO v MLA, Shock and disbelief at the Court of Appeal – Dan Tench The Police Tip-Off and Cliff Richard – Dominic Crossley Social Media: How many people use Twitter and what do we think about it? [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Case Law: ETK v News Group Newspapers “Privacy Injunctions and Children” – Edward Craven Case Law: OPO v MLA, Shock and disbelief at the Court of Appeal – Dan Tench News: Tulisa “Sex Tape”, false privacy turns into true privacy La Regina Nuda and Italian Privacy Law – Athalie Matthews and Giacomo Parmigiani Case Law: Růžový Panter, OS v Czech Republic: Anti-Corruption NGO defamation case, no violation of Article 10 Case… [read post]