Search for: "Daniel Hemel"
Results 261 - 280
of 567
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2019, 6:20 am
Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner have harshly criticized William Barr’s memo on Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s obstruction of justice theory. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 3:00 am
Daniel Hemel (Chicago), The State-Charity Disparity Under the 2017 Tax Law, 58 Wash. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 11:37 am
” Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner explained why the memo Bill Barr drafted for President Trump before being nominated to be Attorney General is poorly reasoned and defenders of the memo are mistaken. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 5:11 pm
Hemel, Eric A. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:09 am
Daniel Hemel has this blog’s analysis of yesterday’s oral argument in Dawson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:07 am
Daniel Hemel had this blog’s preview. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 4:30 am
Loos, in which the justices considered on Tuesday whether a railroad’s payment to an employee for time lost from work can be taxed under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act, comes from Daniel Hemel. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 3:27 am
Daniel Hemel had this blog’s preview. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 3:02 am
North Carolina] Interesting: arguments that might work for progressive litigation outcomes in a more conservative Supreme Court [Daniel Hemel, Take Care] Notable cert grants: continued viability of Illinois Brick indirect purchaser doctrine [Cory Andrews, WLF on Apple v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 8:15 am
For example, in Beyond the Patents–Prizes Debate, Daniel Hemel and I considered a single category of "government grants—a category that includes direct spending on government research laboratories and grants to nongovernment researchers"—with a focus on the similarities among these direct spending mechanisms, and what makes them all different from the other tools in our four-box framework (R&D tax incentives, patents, and inducement prizes).But we… [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 4:12 am
Focusing on the nearer future, Daniel Hemel points out at Take Care that “Roberts Court doctrines regarding the Commerce Clause, compelled speech, commercial speech, RFRA, federalism, and agency deference don’t always tilt toward the right. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 7:40 am
“A Progressive Yankee in John Roberts’ Court”: Daniel Hemel has this post at the “Take Care” blog. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm
Howard Wasserman offers thoughts on the recent Slate debate between Daniel Hemel and Christopher Jon Sprigman. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm
Slate is running a debate between Daniel Hemel (Chicago) and Christopher Jon Sprigman (NYU) about whether progressives should abandon judicial supremacy and a belief in the Court and what it should replace that with. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 1:36 pm
” Law professors Daniel Hemel and Christopher Jon Sprigman have this jurisprudence essay online at Slate, introducing a debate between them. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 11:12 am
Katja Lindroos Weckström, Food For Thought (Halabi “creates a bridge between two polarized debates”) Jeffrey Pojanowski, Exploring the Regulatory World (“the web of legal actors and norms operating in international IP is bewildering in its complexity”) Daniel Hemel, Why do Nations Obey International Law (“it is doubtful that any one theory will fully explain the pattern of international IP shelters that Halabi has observed”)… [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 12:05 pm
Daniel Hemel (Chicago), The Death and Life of the State and Local Tax Deduction, 72 Tax L. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 12:05 pm
Daniel Hemel (Chicago) presents Beyond the Marriage Tax Trilemma at at Michigan as part of its Tax Policy Workshop Series hosted by Reuven Avi-Yonah: For decades, the famous “marriage tax trilemma” has played a central role in discussions of the tax treatment of the family unit. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 3:30 am
Daniel J. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 12:22 pm
Daniel Hemel (Chicago) presents Beyond the Marriage Tax Trilemma at Loyola-L.A. today as part of its Tax Policy Colloquium Series hosted by Ellen Aprill and Katie Pratt: For decades, the famous “marriage tax trilemma” has played a central role in discussions of the tax treatment of the family unit. [read post]
