Search for: "Daniel Hemel" Results 281 - 300 of 551
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2019, 5:07 am by First Mondays
That’s not all—listen to hear us discuss an interesting recent piece by Professor Daniel Hemel on Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the value of life tenure, puzzle over why trust fund babies are suddenly looking to the justices for some tax relief, and explain what Justice Neil Gorsuch’s U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 11:30 am by Paul Caron
This week, Mirit Eyal-Cohen (Alabama) reviews Daniel Hemel (Chicago), The State-Charity Disparity Under the 2017 Tax Law, 58 Wash. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” At Politico Magazine, Daniel Hemel notes that Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s recent health issues have reopened discussions about the drawbacks of life tenure for Supreme Court justices; he concludes that “[f]ixed terms, age caps, and forced retirement are all strong medicine for the problem of judicial disability,” and that “[i]n light of the flaws inherent in each, the better course of treatment is none at all. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 9:58 am by stephaniedorris
# Mueller President Trump Daniel Hemel on the Role of Special Prosecutors Take Care [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:45 am by stephaniedorris
The judiciary Daniel Hemel Explores Term Limits for Supreme Court Justices Politico Magazine [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 1:30 pm
In a New York Times op-ed, Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner go further, arguing that Barr’s memo “seriously damages his credibility and raises questions about his fitness for the Justice Department’s top position. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 12:50 pm by Paul Caron
2,834 Downloads: Joseph Bankman (Stanford), David Gamage (Indiana), Jacob Goldin (Stanford), Daniel Hemel (Chicago), Darien Shanske (UC-Davis), Kirk Stark (UCLA), Dennis Ventry (UC-Davis) & Manoj Viswanathan (UC-Hastings), Federal Income Tax Treatment of Charitable Contributions Entitling the Donor to a State Tax Credit 2,524 Downloads: Sam Donaldson (Georgia State), Understanding the... [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 3:00 am by Paul Caron
Daniel Hemel (Chicago), The State-Charity Disparity Under the 2017 Tax Law, 58 Wash. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Daniel Hemel has this blog’s analysis of yesterday’s oral argument in Dawson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Daniel Hemel had this blog’s preview. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
Loos, in which the justices considered on Tuesday whether a railroad’s payment to an employee for time lost from work can be taxed under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act, comes from Daniel Hemel. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
Daniel Hemel had this blog’s preview. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
North Carolina] Interesting: arguments that might work for progressive litigation outcomes in a more conservative Supreme Court [Daniel Hemel, Take Care] Notable cert grants: continued viability of Illinois Brick indirect purchaser doctrine [Cory Andrews, WLF on Apple v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 8:15 am by Lisa Ouellette
For example, in Beyond the Patents–Prizes Debate, Daniel Hemel and I considered a single category of "government grants—a category that includes direct spending on government research laboratories and grants to nongovernment researchers"—with a focus on the similarities among these direct spending mechanisms, and what makes them all different from the other tools in our four-box framework (R&D tax incentives, patents, and inducement prizes).But we… [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
Focusing on the nearer future, Daniel Hemel points out at Take Care that “Roberts Court doctrines regarding the Commerce Clause, compelled speech, commercial speech, RFRA, federalism, and agency deference don’t always tilt toward the right. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 7:40 am by Howard Bashman
“A Progressive Yankee in John Roberts’ Court”: Daniel Hemel has this post at the “Take Care” blog. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm by Howard Wasserman
Slate is running a debate between Daniel Hemel (Chicago) and Christopher Jon Sprigman (NYU) about whether progressives should abandon judicial supremacy and a belief in the Court and what it should replace that with. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 1:36 pm by Howard Bashman
” Law professors Daniel Hemel and Christopher Jon Sprigman have this jurisprudence essay online at Slate, introducing a debate between them. [read post]