Search for: "Daniel Hemel" Results 281 - 300 of 590
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2019, 1:30 pm
In a New York Times op-ed, Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner go further, arguing that Barr’s memo “seriously damages his credibility and raises questions about his fitness for the Justice Department’s top position. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:54 am by William Ford
Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner responded to Jack Goldsmith’s qualified defense of William Barr’s unsolicited memorandum to the Justice Department criticizing the Mueller investigation. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 12:50 pm by Paul Caron
2,834 Downloads: Joseph Bankman (Stanford), David Gamage (Indiana), Jacob Goldin (Stanford), Daniel Hemel (Chicago), Darien Shanske (UC-Davis), Kirk Stark (UCLA), Dennis Ventry (UC-Davis) & Manoj Viswanathan (UC-Hastings), Federal Income Tax Treatment of Charitable Contributions Entitling the Donor to a State Tax Credit 2,524 Downloads: Sam Donaldson (Georgia State), Understanding the... [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:22 am by William Ford
In response to Andrew McCarthy’s argument that Barr’s memo is legally sound, Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner countered McCarthy’s points and asserted that the memo is poorly reasoned. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 6:20 am by Jack Goldsmith
Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner have harshly criticized William Barr’s memo on Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s obstruction of justice theory. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 3:00 am by Paul Caron
Daniel Hemel (Chicago), The State-Charity Disparity Under the 2017 Tax Law, 58 Wash. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 11:37 am by Scott Harman, William Ford
Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner explained why the memo Bill Barr drafted for President Trump before being nominated to be Attorney General is poorly reasoned and defenders of the memo are mistaken. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Daniel Hemel has this blog’s analysis of yesterday’s oral argument in Dawson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Daniel Hemel had this blog’s preview. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
Loos, in which the justices considered on Tuesday whether a railroad’s payment to an employee for time lost from work can be taxed under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act, comes from Daniel Hemel. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
Daniel Hemel had this blog’s preview. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
North Carolina] Interesting: arguments that might work for progressive litigation outcomes in a more conservative Supreme Court [Daniel Hemel, Take Care] Notable cert grants: continued viability of Illinois Brick indirect purchaser doctrine [Cory Andrews, WLF on Apple v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 8:15 am by Lisa Ouellette
For example, in Beyond the Patents–Prizes Debate, Daniel Hemel and I considered a single category of "government grants—a category that includes direct spending on government research laboratories and grants to nongovernment researchers"—with a focus on the similarities among these direct spending mechanisms, and what makes them all different from the other tools in our four-box framework (R&D tax incentives, patents, and inducement prizes).But we… [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
Focusing on the nearer future, Daniel Hemel points out at Take Care that “Roberts Court doctrines regarding the Commerce Clause, compelled speech, commercial speech, RFRA, federalism, and agency deference don’t always tilt toward the right. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 7:40 am by Howard Bashman
“A Progressive Yankee in John Roberts’ Court”: Daniel Hemel has this post at the “Take Care” blog. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm by David Lat
Howard Wasserman offers thoughts on the recent Slate debate between Daniel Hemel and Christopher Jon Sprigman. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm by Howard Wasserman
Slate is running a debate between Daniel Hemel (Chicago) and Christopher Jon Sprigman (NYU) about whether progressives should abandon judicial supremacy and a belief in the Court and what it should replace that with. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 1:36 pm by Howard Bashman
” Law professors Daniel Hemel and Christopher Jon Sprigman have this jurisprudence essay online at Slate, introducing a debate between them. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 11:12 am by Dennis Crouch
Katja Lindroos Weckström, Food For Thought (Halabi “creates a bridge between two polarized debates”) Jeffrey Pojanowski, Exploring the Regulatory World (“the web of legal actors and norms operating in international IP is bewildering in its complexity”) Daniel Hemel, Why do Nations Obey International Law (“it is doubtful that any one theory will fully explain the pattern of international IP shelters that Halabi has observed”)… [read post]