Search for: "Daniel Hemel"
Results 421 - 440
of 593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2013, 7:07 am
Hemel & Lisa Larrimore Ouellette (we are of course thrilled to be on this list!) [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 2:01 pm
Ouellette (@PatentScholar) June 2, 2014Rochelle Dreyfuss responds to Daniel Hemel's and my "Beyond the Patents-Prizes Debate" in @TexasLRev http://t.co/c3gKp1en18— Lisa L. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 6:46 am
Monday, March 20 – Daniel Hemel, University of Chicago Law School9. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm
Howard Wasserman offers thoughts on the recent Slate debate between Daniel Hemel and Christopher Jon Sprigman. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
Assistant Professor Daniel Hemel on the Supreme Court’s certiorari grant in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
Assistant Professor Daniel Hemel on the Supreme Court’s certiorari grant in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
Assistant Professor Daniel Hemel on the Supreme Court’s certiorari grant in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 6:58 am
"The idea would be to index assets for inflation for purposes of measuring capital gain, while not adjusting anything else for inflation.To show the problems with doing this, as Daniel Hemel and David Kamin explain:"Imagine that a taxpayer buys an asset for $100 that is fully financed by a loan. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 2:36 pm
An interesting new paper, by Daniel Hemel and our former co-blogger Eric Posner. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:05 am
Daniel Hemel is an assistant professor of law at the University of Chicago Law School. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 1:02 pm
Hemel and Ouellette highlight several: patents, prizes, grants, R&D tax credits, and patent boxes (tax breaks on patent income). [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm
Feinstein of the University of Pennsylvania and Daniel J. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 3:02 am
North Carolina] Interesting: arguments that might work for progressive litigation outcomes in a more conservative Supreme Court [Daniel Hemel, Take Care] Notable cert grants: continued viability of Illinois Brick indirect purchaser doctrine [Cory Andrews, WLF on Apple v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 9:11 pm
This case has important distributive implications for foreign consumers, as Daniel Hemel and I describe in our new essay, Trade and Tradeoffs: The Case of International Patent Exhaustion (forthcoming in the Columbia Law Review Sidebar).In a Patently-O post last week, we asked whether the Federal Circuit would recognize the U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:52 am
Hemel, at the Stanford Law Review Online. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 12:42 pm
Assistant Professor Daniel Hemel on tomorrow’s Supreme Court oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 12:42 pm
Assistant Professor Daniel Hemel on tomorrow’s Supreme Court oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 12:42 pm
Assistant Professor Daniel Hemel on tomorrow’s Supreme Court oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 2:00 am
UC Hastings Law – Gregg Polsky, the Francis Shackelford Distinguished Professor in Taxation Law, University of Georgia School of Law, presents his paper “Taxing Buybacks” (co-authored with Daniel Hemel, University of Chicago Law School) at the UC Hastings Center on Tax Law 2020 Tax Speaker Series, 3:40 pm (PST) via Zoom. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:20 pm
Initial posts already up at the site include Presidential Bad Faith by Larry Tribe, Desuetude and Immigration Enforcement by Jamal Greene, See You In Court 2.0 by Leah Litman, Trump’s Approach to Crime & Punishment by Chiraag Bains, Faith in the Ninth Circuit by Daniel Hemel and Youngstown Zone Zero by Leah Litman and Ian Samuel. [read post]
