Search for: "Daniel Hemel" Results 421 - 440 of 569
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2017, 7:05 am by Lisa Ouellette
But as Daniel and I have explained, "the cost of determining whether the patentee has reserved its U.S. patent rights does not seem particularly onerous in comparison with all the other information costs involved in verifying that a product is noninfringing. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Russo, Religious and Cultural Dress at School: A Comparative Perspective, (Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, Vol. 14, No. 6, 2011).Daniel Martin and Jessica Margolin, Uniform Guidelines, Spirituality, and Predictors of Ethical Workplace Behaviors, (Journal of Law, Business and Ethics, Forthcoming).C. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:00 am by Guest Blogger
As Daniel Hemel and I analyzed in Beyond the Patents–Prizes Debate, the state also encourages information production through mechanisms such as tax incentives and direct spending. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 11:36 am by Daniel Shaviro
My prior post touched on a variety of background philosophical issues raised by Miranda Perry Fleischer’s presentation yesterday at the colloquium of her paper (co-authored with Daniel Hemel), Atlas Nods: The Libertarian Case for a Basic Income. [read post]
16 May 2018, 12:30 pm by Ilya Somin
Prominent legal scholars Brian Galle (Georgetown) and Daniel Hemel (University of Chicago) are far less enthusiastic. [read post]
29 May 2016, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
”Writing for the same publication, Daniel Hemel reviews Taxing the Rich: A History of Fiscal Fairness in the United States and Europe, by Kenneth Scheve and David Stasavage, which argues that governments tax the rich “during and in the wake of mass mobilization for war” because wartime enables governments to make “compensatory arguments” about the need for sacrifice. [read post]
 Daniel Hemel is an assistant professor at the University of Chicago Law School and a visiting professor at Stanford Law School. [read post]
Daniel Hemel is an assistant professor at the University of Chicago Law School and Lisa Larrimore Ouellette is an associate professor at Stanford Law School. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 2:00 am by mes286
University of Virginia School of Law –Daniel Hemel, Professor of Law, University of Chicago The Law School, presents today as part of the Faculty Workshop Series. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 2:00 am by mes286
., The Arjay and Frances Fearing Miller Chair in Federal Economic Policy, The Brookings Institution; Daniel Hemel, Professor of Law and Ronald H. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 5:07 am by First Mondays
That’s not all—listen to hear us discuss an interesting recent piece by Professor Daniel Hemel on Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the value of life tenure, puzzle over why trust fund babies are suddenly looking to the justices for some tax relief, and explain what Justice Neil Gorsuch’s U.S. [read post]
1 May 2020, 9:05 pm by Jamison Chung
Libertarians are often skeptical of government-sponsored income redistribution programs, yet some of the biggest proponents of UBI are self-described libertarians, argue Miranda Fleischer and Daniel Hemel in an article published in the Wisconsin Law Review. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 6:27 am by Scott Bomboy
University of Chicago Law School professor Daniel Hemel, writing for Slate, believes the Trump team has several persuasive arguments. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:00 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Daniel Hemel and I just posted a new draft paper, Beyond the Patents-Prizes Debate, which I'll be presenting on Saturday at PatCon 3 at Chicago-Kent. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 11:37 am by Scott Harman, William Ford
Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner explained why the memo Bill Barr drafted for President Trump before being nominated to be Attorney General is poorly reasoned and defenders of the memo are mistaken. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 2:04 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
As I've argued (along with Daniel Hemel) in Beyond the Patents–Prizes Debate, R&D tax credits are a very important innovation incentive, and Lo doesn't seem to have accounted for these changes in the tax code. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 7:16 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Daniel Hemel and I argue that this is wrong: for welfare-enhancing R&D projects (where the expected social benefit of that project is greater than the expected cost), incentives are "fully efficient" so long as the private benefit from patent and non-patent incentives (such as first-mover advantage) exceeds the post-tax cost. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:14 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
As Daniel Hemel and I explain in Beyond the Patents-Prizes Debate (forthcoming in the Texas Law Review), the U.S. already spends over $10 billion each year on R&D tax incentives. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 5:30 am by Adam Thimmesch
Daniel Hemel has rightfully pointed out that the proposed plan would, all else being equal, provide an incentive for states to rely more heavily on property taxes and less on income taxes. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 11:34 am by Andrew Hamm
Commentary comes from Jason Ritchie at The National Law Review, Trevor Burrus at Cato at Liberty, Michael Doyle at McClatchy, Greg Sargent at The Washington Post, Adam Feldman at Empirical SCOTUS, Daniel Hemel and David Louk at Medium, and Matthew Watkins and Neena Satija at The Texas Tribune. [read post]