Search for: "Daniel Hemel"
Results 561 - 580
of 589
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2015, 10:00 am
Daniel Hemel and Lisa Ouellette have already situated IP regimes among a variety of other government policy levers designed to affirmatively encourage innovation and market entry, including prizes, grants, and tax incentives [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:46 am
As Daniel Hemel and I analyzed in Beyond the Patents–Prizes Debate, the state also encourages information production through mechanisms such as tax incentives and direct spending. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
As Daniel Hemel and I analyzed in Beyond the Patents–Prizes Debate, the state also encourages information production through mechanisms such as tax incentives and direct spending. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 4:48 pm
(As Daniel Hemel and I point out in Beyond the Patents-Prizes Debate, one of the main downsides of ex post rewards like patents and prizes over ex ante rewards like grants and R&D tax credits is that ex post rewards require innovators to obtain financing to cover early R&D costs.) [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 1:36 pm
.), by Daniel Hemel and Lisa Larrimore OuelletteAnother place to look for these sorts of arguments is in the the work of economists like Brian Wright (Patents, Prizes, and Research Contracts), and Joseph Stiglitz. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 2:01 pm
Ouellette (@PatentScholar) June 2, 2014Rochelle Dreyfuss responds to Daniel Hemel's and my "Beyond the Patents-Prizes Debate" in @TexasLRev http://t.co/c3gKp1en18— Lisa L. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 1:02 pm
Hemel and Ouellette highlight several: patents, prizes, grants, R&D tax credits, and patent boxes (tax breaks on patent income). [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 6:56 am
On Sunday the Yale Law School Information Society Project is hosting our Innovation Law Beyond IP conference, at which I'll be moderating the plenary session and presenting Beyond the Patents-Prizes Debate (coauthored with Daniel Hemel). [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 7:45 am
First, John Golden and Hannah Wiseman describe their paper, The Fracking Revolution: A Case Study in Policy Levers to Promote Innovation, which will be presented in our "Comparing Innovation Policy Levers" along with my paper with Daniel Hemel. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 12:46 pm
As Lisa Larrimore Ouellette observes in her blog post for this conference, and co-authored paper with Daniel Hemel, delayed and speculative rewards under an ex post incentive regime can deter creative investment. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:55 pm
To kick off this symposium, I’ll say a bit about the article I’m presenting, Beyond the Patents–Prizes Debate (coauthored with Daniel Hemel and recently published in the Texas Law Review), and how it fits with the broader conference agenda.Continuing reading at Balkinization. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 7:53 am
To kick off this symposium, I’ll say a bit about the article I’m presenting, Beyond the Patents–Prizes Debate (coauthored with Daniel Hemel and recently published in the Texas Law Review), and how it fits with the broader conference agenda.So far, intellectual property law has been the primary legal field in which we think about both technical and creative innovation. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:07 am
Hemel & Lisa Larrimore Ouellette (we are of course thrilled to be on this list!) [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:26 am
Abbott presents it) seems to satisfy all the conditions under which Daniel Hemel and I argue that prizes are optimal: the government can set a clear goal (production of information sufficient to show that an approved drug is unsafe) and will be better than the market at setting an appropriate reward (since the social benefit of this information is much greater than its market value), but depending on the complexity of mining, the government may be at a disadvantage in identifying… [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:14 am
As Daniel Hemel and I explain in Beyond the Patents-Prizes Debate (forthcoming in the Texas Law Review), the U.S. already spends over $10 billion each year on R&D tax incentives. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 10:00 am
Daniel J. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 7:16 am
Daniel Hemel and I argue that this is wrong: for welfare-enhancing R&D projects (where the expected social benefit of that project is greater than the expected cost), incentives are "fully efficient" so long as the private benefit from patent and non-patent incentives (such as first-mover advantage) exceeds the post-tax cost. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:00 am
Daniel Hemel and I just posted a new draft paper, Beyond the Patents-Prizes Debate, which I'll be presenting on Saturday at PatCon 3 at Chicago-Kent. [read post]
18 May 2012, 4:23 pm
Daniel Jacob Hemel (Yale University - Law School) has posted Executive Action and the First Amendment's First Word (Pepperdine Law Review, Vol. 40, 2013, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:26 am
Writing at PrawfsBlawg, Daniel Hemel argues that Florida v. [read post]
