Search for: "Daniel Tokaji" Results 41 - 53 of 53
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2008, 5:43 pm
Daniel Tokaji answers in the negative, explaining that HAVA's matching requirement aimed to accelerate procedures at the polls, somewhat like an E-Z pass lane at highway poll plazas, to allow voters to avoid showing identification if they had already been screened using database checks, not to determine eligibility, deter voter fraud or raise added barriers for voters by forcing some to vote provisionally. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 10:11 am by Dan Tokaji
ELJ 11:1 – Table of Contents The Party Line: One Year and Counting, Paul Gronke &  Daniel P. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am by Cormac Early
Holder, the challenge to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, continues with contributions from Ryan Emenaker and Daniel Tokaji. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:07 am by Conor McEvily
Perez, ACSblog’s Daniel Tokaji writes that though the decision avoids “the looming issue of Section 5’s constitutionality . . . we may not have to wait long before it appears again. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 3:34 am by Amy Howe
”  At ACSblog, Daniel Tokaji argues that the case is an important one “because what the Court says will affect how states draw state legislative districts after the next census and possibly even sooner. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 9:44 am by Rick Hasen
Tokaji, The Ohio State University, Michael E. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Redistricting Law Refined Tuesday, July 19, 2016  | Daniel Tokaji The Supreme Court case, Harris v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 5:02 am by Jim Sedor
Soft Money’s Squishy Political Influence New York Times – Derek Willis | Published: 6/18/2014 A report by Daniel Tokaji and Renata Strause of Ohio State University surveys the state of campaign finance and finds the relationship between candidates and like-minded independent groups is characterized by subtle cooperation, not outright coordination. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Why Cabinet Secretaries Should Not Threaten Members of Congress August 14, 2017  | Cary Coglianese, Gabriel Scheffler, and Daniel E. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Why Cabinet Secretaries Should Not Threaten Members of Congress August 14, 2017  | Cary Coglianese, Gabriel Scheffler, and Daniel E. [read post]