Search for: "Daniel v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 5,536
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2024, 9:24 am
Daniel Grütters appeared on behalf of the Appellant (instructed by Morrsion Spowart). [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Davis, and Rose James, Teneo, on Monday, February 26, 2024 Tags: affirmative action, Anti-DEI, dei, Diversity, Stakeholders, Transparency Oregon State Treasury Nomination Neutrality Posted by Philip Larrieu, Oregon State Treasury, on Monday, February 26, 2024 Tags: Board of Directors, Director nominations, fiduciary duty, Proxy access, shareholder interests, Universal Proxy Rebellion extinction: Does Exxon mark the end of shareholder engagement? [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Davis, and Rose James, Teneo, on Monday, February 26, 2024 Tags: affirmative action, Anti-DEI, dei, Diversity, Stakeholders, Transparency Oregon State Treasury Nomination Neutrality Posted by Philip Larrieu, Oregon State Treasury, on Monday, February 26, 2024 Tags: Board of Directors, Director nominations, fiduciary duty, Proxy access, shareholder interests, Universal Proxy Rebellion extinction: Does Exxon mark the end of shareholder engagement? [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:10 am
As such, it is a State entitled to take countermeasures. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Daniel L. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 11:51 am
v=WgcrmuKK-iY&t. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:12 am
The January 2024 high court judgment in Cash Crusaders Franchising (Pty) Ltd v Cash Crusaders Franchisees Listed on Annexure ‘ADP1’ to the Founding Affidavit of Andries Daniel Du Plooy (16453/2023) [2024] ZAWCHC 11 related to a dispute between Cash Crusaders Franchising (Pty) Ltd and franchisees arising from a systemic change by Cash Crusaders of the rules pertaining to pawn transactions. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
” Bragg based the gag order restrictions on the 1966 United States Supreme Court case Sheppard v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Things can be source identifiers, without being commercial source identifiers (United We Stand): confusion but not dilution actionable Jack Daniel’s didn’t purport to decide the full scope of the “noncommercial” exclusion. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am
Article prepared by and republished courtesy of our colleagues Stephen Taeusch, Daniel Turinsky, and Carsten Reichel; originally published here: https://www.dlapiper.com/en/insights/publications/2024/01/what-to-know-about-noncompete-agreements-in-2024 As we head into 2024, employers can expect more risk related to the use of restrictive covenants at both the federal and state level. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Jones-Doherty, Morally Regulatable Lives: Corporate Sovereignty, the Rise of Burwell v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 9:40 am
The Reuters report and hearing come as reports of threats against local, state and federal judges have proliferated nationwide. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered: February 08, 2024 Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kern, Friedman, O'Neill Levy, Michael, JJ. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered: February 08, 2024 Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kern, Friedman, O'Neill Levy, Michael, JJ. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
“Frankly, I can't give any explanation for why the authors have been so dilatory,” Daniel Boorstin, Librarian of Congress, told the New York Times in 1983. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am
The legal opinion would become popularly known as The Boldt Decision.The actual title of the case is United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm
Twitter Another Must-Carry Lawsuit Against YouTube Fails–Daniels v Alphabet Newspaper Isn’t State Actor–Plotkin v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 5:12 am
" United States v. [read post]
