Search for: "Danielle Citron" Results 141 - 160 of 499
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2018, 5:00 am by Jesse Lempel
Bobby Chesney and Danielle Citron recently sounded the alarm on Lawfare about the threat to democracy from “deep fakes,” lamenting “the limits of technological and legal solutions. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 1:24 pm by William Ford
Danielle Citron and Quinta Jurecic dissected the strengths and weakness of the Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act (FOSTA). [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 10:17 am by William Ford
In response to Robert Chesney and Danielle Citron’s breakdown of the threat posed by “deep fakes,” Herb Lin offered a technological solution to the problem that the pair failed to consider. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:58 am by William Ford
Herb Lin addressed a potential technological solution to the problem of “deep fakes” that Robert Chesney and Danielle Citron laid out. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Herb Lin
Bobby Chesney and Danielle Citron have painted a truly depressing picture of a future in which faked video and audio cannot be distinguished from the real thing. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Susan Landau
And Danielle Citron has described how even before breach laws—now on the books in 48 states—state attorneys general were “laboratories of privacy enforcement” establishing a variety of protections. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 5:57 am by William Ford
In a gripping piece, Chesney and Danielle Citron dissected the threat of “deep fakes,” their implications for national security, and potential responses to them. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 1:20 pm by William Ford
  ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Bobby Chesney and Danielle Citron dissected the looming threat of “deep fakes,” dangerously realistic digital manipulations of images, sound, and video used to impersonate people. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 6:07 am by Tracy Thomas
Danielle Keats Citron, A Poor Mother's Right to Privacy: A Review, 98 Boston J. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 2:00 pm by Ezra Rosser
New Article: Danielle Keats Citron, A Poor Mother’s Right to Privacy: A Review, 98 B.U. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 6:00 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer
by Catherine Padhi The Fourth Circuit Remands Wikimedia’s Suit Against NSA Back to District Court by Jordan Brunner, Quinta Jurecic, and Yishai Schwartz Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court Approves New Targeting and Minimization Procedures: A Summary by Jordan Brunner, Emma Kohse, Helen Klein Murillo, Amira Mikhail, and Ed Stein Digital Divergence: How Digital Network Technology Threatens both Privacy and Security by David Kris Trump’s Social Media Plan: Problematic Law and… [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
[Danielle Citron, Cato Policy Analysis] Tags: Europe, Facebook, free speech, Google, hate speech, social media Can online media resist “creeping censorship” from EU? [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 6:38 am by Andrew Koppelman
Chen, Danielle Keats Citron & Benjamin Wittes, Raphael Cohen-Almagor, Caroline Mala Corbin, David S. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 5:40 am by SHG
Even Danielle Citron realized that a mens rea requirement was minimally necessary, breaking ranks from Mary Anne Franks’ twisted fury that allowed for any claim that served her end. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 11:31 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Gray, Laura Donohue, Tracey Maclin, Danielle Keats Citron, Morgan Cloud, William J. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Frosio, Université de Strasbourg – CEIPI The Internet Will Not Break: Denying Bad Samaritans Section 230 Immunity, Fordham Law Review, Forthcoming, U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2017-22, Danielle Keats Citron and Benjamin Wittes, University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law and Brookings Institution. [read post]
19 Aug 2017, 3:48 am by Matthew Kahn
And Danielle Citron and Helen Norton argued that political leaders have an obligation to challenge hate and explained the consequences of not doing so. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 1:08 pm by Rebecca Heller
Danielle Citron and Helen Norton discussed the importance of strong responses from government officials in the face of hate crimes and hate speech. [read post]