Search for: "Daniels v. City & County of San Francisco"
Results 21 - 40
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
County of San Diego (2020) 47 Cal.App.5th 504. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
County of San Diego (2020) 47 Cal.App.5th 504. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
County of San Diego (2020) 47 Cal.App.5th 504. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:12 pm
Indeed, in a December 2019 Ninth Circuit ruling, City & Cty. of San Francisco v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Workers and their union and community allies have demonstrated for a minimum of $15 per hour, more than double the federal law, and they have done so successfully in a number of jurisdictions, both in cities and states like Seattle, Mountain View, San Francisco, and on a staggered basis, even California which possesses the fifth-largest economy in the world! [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am
The Supreme Court took a case raising a similar question in City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm
The Supreme Court took a case raising a similar question in City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
County of San Diego (September 28, 2018, case no. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2017) 16 Cal.App.5th 261. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
City of South San Francisco (September 18, 2017) 2017 Cal. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
City of South San Francisco (September 18, 2017) 2017 Cal. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:27 pm
Gavoor & Daniel Miktus, Public Participation in Nonlegislative Rulemaking, 61 L. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:09 am
The Court also heard oral argument on Monday in City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm
Another respondent – the City and County of San Francisco – has filed a brief that more seriously addresses the standing issue over the course of ten pages. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
City and County of San Francisco (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 950: The lead agency correctly applied a Class 3 CEQA exemption to applications for permits to add wireless equipment throughout the City and County of San Francisco. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
Prospect, IL 60056-5788 AMERICAN SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION DBA MERCHANTS INTERSTATE COLLECTION AGENCY 640 PLAZA DR STE 310 HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80129 AMERIQUEST RECOVERY SERVICES LLC 1845 HIGHWAY 93 SOUTH STE 310 KALISPELL, MT 59901 AMSHER COLLECTION SERVICES INC 600 BEACON PKY STE 300 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35209 APEX FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT LLC 1120 LAKE COOK RD BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089 APOLLO CREDIT AGENCY INC DBA WESTERN RECOVERY INC DBA ULTRACHEK INC 3501 S TELLER ST LAKEWOOD, CO… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
Prospect, IL 60056-5788 AMERICAN SERVICE FINANCE CORPORATION DBA MERCHANTS INTERSTATE COLLECTION AGENCY 640 PLAZA DR STE 310 HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80129 AMERIQUEST RECOVERY SERVICES LLC 1845 HIGHWAY 93 SOUTH STE 310 KALISPELL, MT 59901 AMSHER COLLECTION SERVICES INC 600 BEACON PKY STE 300 BIRMINGHAM, AL 35209 APEX FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT LLC 1120 LAKE COOK RD BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089 APOLLO CREDIT AGENCY INC DBA WESTERN RECOVERY INC DBA ULTRACHEK INC 3501 S TELLER ST LAKEWOOD, CO… [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
Gervais, Daniel. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
