Search for: "Daniels v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,955
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2025, 7:49 am
In a death penalty case Mickens v. [read post]
12 May 2025, 5:00 am
Daniel O’Connor, Amy D. [read post]
10 May 2025, 4:35 am
Here is the order: AFGE v. [read post]
9 May 2025, 9:05 pm
Biber and Daniel A. [read post]
9 May 2025, 3:00 am
But after the fall of Roe v. [read post]
8 May 2025, 9:05 pm
The Trump Administration agreed to halt a funding freeze against Maine for the state’s treatment of transgender athletes, settling the lawsuit Maine filed against the U.S. [read post]
5 May 2025, 11:34 am
Mohamed v LB Hounslow. [read post]
2 May 2025, 3:10 am
Bonta; X Corp. v. [read post]
1 May 2025, 12:40 pm
The Michigan Attorney Discipline Board has suspended an attorney on an interim basis On December 10, 2024, respondent was convicted by guilty plea of Vehicular Homicide, a felony under Florida Statute § 782.071(1)(a), in State of Florida v Richard Daniel... [read post]
1 May 2025, 9:03 am
Twitter Another Must-Carry Lawsuit Against YouTube Fails–Daniels v Alphabet Newspaper Isn’t State Actor–Plotkin v. [read post]
1 May 2025, 6:00 am
Murphy’s article Abandon Chevron and Modernize Stare Decisis for the Administrative State is cited in the following article: Jennifer L. [read post]
30 Apr 2025, 1:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2025, 7:20 pm
AM General LLC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2025, 6:41 am
” “The SDT did not believe this, saying that up to this point in the proceedings, Mr Mian had stated that his wife was a silent director and shareholder and that the failure to advise clients of the conflict was an error and oversight caused by the strains of a busy practice. [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
Moreover, "[u]nder settled principles, the doctrine of estoppel will not provide eligibility [to retirement benefits] where by statute a person clearly does not qualify" (Matter of Price v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 107 AD3d 1212, 1216 [3d Dept 2013] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citation omitted]; see Matter of Schuyler v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 158 AD3d 909, 912 [3d… [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
Moreover, "[u]nder settled principles, the doctrine of estoppel will not provide eligibility [to retirement benefits] where by statute a person clearly does not qualify" (Matter of Price v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 107 AD3d 1212, 1216 [3d Dept 2013] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citation omitted]; see Matter of Schuyler v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 158 AD3d 909, 912 [3d… [read post]
21 Apr 2025, 5:13 pm
EPA, and Sackett v. [read post]
21 Apr 2025, 5:01 am
Rodgin Cohen, Amanda Flug Davidoff, Daniel J. [read post]
20 Apr 2025, 12:34 pm
Executive Branch Reinterpretation – Again Under the Trump administration, Principal Deputy Solicitor Daniel H. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 11:01 am
Twitter Another Must-Carry Lawsuit Against YouTube Fails–Daniels v Alphabet Newspaper Isn’t State Actor–Plotkin v. [read post]
