Search for: "Daniels v. United States of America" Results 201 - 220 of 381
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Kite, The History of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana (Indiana Historical Society Press, 2007); Mark Edward Lender, "This Honorable Court": The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, 1789-2000 (Rutgers University Press, 2006); John O. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by Lucie Olejnikova
 Keith Sullivan Team Members: Arthur Muller (3L), Vittoria Fiorenza (2L), Kiera Fitzpatrick (3L), Alex Zugaro (3L) The competition involved a criminal case of the United States of America v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:54 am by Amy Howe
And in Bank of America v. [read post]
30 May 2015, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
While it’s been difficult to wait for the past eight months, we are now confident that the trial of the United States of America v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:13 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which it is considering the mens rea requirement for federal narcotics cases. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:05 am by Rich McHugh
Citing the 1996 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Verity Corp. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 12:37 pm
  The essay is also important for an important judiciary noticeable by its absence--that of the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 12:57 pm by Linda Holmes
Virginia in a Post-Racial World: Rethinking Race, Sex and Marriage (2012) Same-Sex Marriage: Klarman, Michael, From the Closet to the Altar (2012) Mello, Michael, Legalizing Gay Marriage (2004) Moats, David, Civil Wars: A Battle for Gay Marriage (2004) Pierceson, Jason, Same-Sex Marriage in the United States (2013) Pinello, Daniel, America’s Struggle for Same-Sex Marriage (2006) Premarital Agreements: Dublin, Arlene, Prenups for Lovers: A Romantic Guide to… [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am by Amy Howe
” Five years ago today, the Court issued its decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Moving to Latin America, the floor was taken by Barbarita Guzmán, who focused on interaction between trade marks and copyright -- also considering the ‘moral rights’ issue in Bolivia, Colombia, Peru, and Ecuador. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
 United States of America, 2014 SCC 72 (35072) Nov. 14, 2014 Parliament has authorized the cross-border sharing of wiretap communications under s. 193(2) (e) of the Criminal Code, and the disclosure here was lawfully authorized by that provision, which taken as a whole, does not violate s. 8 of the Charter. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:01 am by Hanibal Goitom
, Practical Global Tort Litigation: United States, Germany, and Argentina (2007). [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:48 am
Most of Latin America lacks legislation comparable to the United States’ Safe Harbors act that protects technology companies from liability over third-party content.. . . . [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
Whereas his previous work did an admi- rable job of depicting how the historical trans- formation of ownership in the United States was aided by the process of measuring and recording, he has expanded his range here into a somewhat unmanageable though always interesting tract. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 5:39 am
Leesfield Scolaro continues to represent victims of negligence and wrongdoing from around the country and the world with recent results for clients from Europe, Canada, South America and the continental United States. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am by Schachtman
United States, 320 U.S. 1, 60–61 (1943) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting in part) (‘‘it is an old observation that the training of Anglo–American judges ill fits them to discharge the duties cast upon them by patent legislation’’); Parke–Davis & Co. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
  In comparing the two readings what differences in approaches can one discern between that of equity as practiced outside the United States (in Australia) and in the United States.2. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 4:40 am by SHG
But just as ideas aren’t subject to the approval of self-appointed censors like Danielle Citron, they similarly aren’t any business of the United States of America, no matter who is in office or how artfully they pander to the public to justify the eradication of words and ideas that hurt your feelings or give you a headache. [read post]