Search for: "Daniels v. Williams" Results 1 - 20 of 1,041
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2019, 6:53 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Witness for the prosecution — Competence Leigh Danielle Williams, appellant, was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Allegany County of attempted kidnapping and second-degree assault. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 3:12 pm by Karen Tani
Williams argues that antiabortion activists invested more in legal strategies after the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 7:39 am by Daily Record Staff
Civil litigation — Failure to act with due diligence — Dismissal In 2012, Daniel and Carol Bahr allege that their neighbors, Steven and Barbara Hughes, removed trees from the Hugheses’ property improperly through their agents, Myers Tree Services, Inc. and William Myers (collectively “Myers”), and Shannon T. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 9:47 pm
From SSRN.com: University of Michigan CrimProf Daniel Martin Katz recently published Institutional Rules, Strategic Behavior, and the Legacy ofChief Justice William Rehnquist: Setting the Record Straight on Dickerson v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 8:06 am
For publication opinions today (1): In Frederick William LaCava v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 12:17 am
Daniel Martin Katz, Political Science, Michigan (Ph.D. student), has an article on SSRN that is forthcoming in the Journal of Law and Politics, Institutional Rules, Strategic Behavior and the Legacy of Chief Justice William Rehnquist: Setting the Record Straight on Dickerson v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 3:30 am by Mary Ziegler
Williams, Defenders of the Unborn: The Pro-Life Movement Before Roe v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 7:54 am by scanner1
DANIEL WILLIAM BATEY, Respondent and Appellee. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 12:33 am by JA Hodnicki
Daniel Sokol Jay Himes & William Reiss (Labaton & Sucharow) describe Duking It Out in Antitrust Price-Fixing: Class Actions After Dukes. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 6:04 pm
Daniel Sokol A brief for cert in Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. linkLine Communications by a number of law professors and professors of economics (William J. [read post]