Search for: "Dansker v. Dansker"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2019, 4:41 am
Somma v Dansker & Aspromonte Assoc., 44 AD3d 376, 377 [1st Dept 2007]; Alden v Brindisi, Murad, Brindisi, Pearlman, Julian & Pertz [“The People’s Lawyer”], 91 AD3d 1311, 1311 [4th Dept 2012]). [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:38 am
Indeed, we note that the record establishes that defendant afforded plaintiff and her successor counsel "sufficient time and opportunity to adequately protect plaintiff's rights" (Somma v Dansker & Aspromonte Assoc., 44 AD3d 376, 377; see Maksimiak v Schwartzapfel Novick Truhowsky Marcus, P.C., 82 AD3d 652; Katz v Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., 48 AD3d 640, 641; cf. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 3:59 am
, 82 AD3d 652, 652 [1st Dept 2011]; Somma v Dansker & Aspromonte Assoc. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 3:46 am
Defendants thus failed to establish that "plaintiff[s'] successor counsel had sufficient time and opportunity to adequately protect plaintiff[s'] rights" (Somma v Dansker & Aspromonte Assoc., 44 AD3d 376, 377; cf. [read post]
