Search for: "Daphne Keller" Results 1 - 20 of 187
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2024, 2:02 pm by Chris Williams
Alito Is Willing To Be Undisciplined If It Gets Him There: Daphne Keller catches Supreme Court justice in a "This you? [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 10:23 am by Eugene Volokh
For a thoughtful, detailed treatment of the laws' practical effects (which is what the majority seems to be calling for), see Daphne Keller's Platform Transparency and the First Amendment article. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:16 am by Don Chen
Even then, he noted the risk of what Daphne Kellers refers to as “anticipatory obedience,” whereby regulated entities shape their conduct to avoid adverse reactions from the government. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 5:36 pm by Howard Bashman
“The NetChoice Cases Aren’t About Discrimination; Texas and Florida are telling the Supreme Court that their social media laws are like civil rights laws prohibiting discrimination against minority groups; They’re wrong”: Daphne Keller has this post at the “Lawfare” blog. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:15 am by Stewart Baker
And in quick takes, I celebrate the end of the Reign of Mickey Mouse in copyright law Paul explains why Madison Square Garden is still able to ban lawyers who have sued the Garden I note the new short-term FISA 702 extension Paul predicts that the Supreme Court will soon decide whether police can require suspects to provide police with phone passcodes And Paul and I quickly debate Daphne Keller's amicus brief for Frances Fukuyama in the Supreme Court's content moderation… [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 12:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
As a result, free expression considerations can in turn play a structuring role when courts interpret the elements of such tort claims.The post Journal of Free Speech Law: "Carriage and Removal Requirements for Internet Platforms: What <i>Taamneh</i> Tells Us," by Daphne Keller appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 10:26 am by Eugene Volokh
The article, which is directly relevant to the Netchoice cases that the Court will consider this Term, is here; here's the Introduction: Major U.S. platforms can powerfully influence public discourse by removing, promoting, and otherwise moderating users' online speech. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 3:00 pm by Eugene Volokh
A very interesting analysis, from the author of a forthcoming (just in a few weeks) Journal of Free Speech Law article on the subject.The post Daphne Keller (Stanford) on the "Transparency" Issues in the <i>Netchoice</i> Cases appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 4:22 pm by David Greene
EFF represented the plaintiffs along with lead counsel, Robert Corn-Revere (initially with Davis, Wright Tremaine LLP and later with the Foundation for Individual Rights & Expression); Walters Law Group; and Daphne Keller. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm by Legal Aggregate
In this annual roundup, we offer highlights of the commentary and insight that Stanford Law School faculty members provided on key SCOTUS decisions during this year’s term (beginning October 2022). [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Daphne Keller: Such a mistake to add generative AI—the policy questions around AI for criminal sentencing, whether you get a loan, etc. are so important and deserve attention—would be better to deal with content generation/speech separately. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Chair: Daphne Keller: EU heavy compliance obligations + a bunch of other laws coming into effect right as platforms are laying off people who know how to do that—a bumpy road. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 2:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Daphne Keller: DSA prohibits inconsistency: you have a right of appeal to resolve hard judgment calls and get to consistency. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Daphne Keller: There’s a real difference b/t a culture that has real trust in regulators to do things with vague language and one that doesn’t. [read post]
Daphne Keller is a lecturer in law at Stanford Law School and director of the Program on Platform Regulation at Stanford’s Cyber Policy Center. [read post]
” Such a holding would likely, as Daphne Keller wrote recently on Lawfare, lead skittish platforms to “adopt new, overly zealous enforcement practices,” which could lead to censorship of, say, innocuous content posted in Arabic or certain types of online political activism, depending on the assumptions and biases of the content moderators. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 5:16 am by Riana Pfefferkorn
If private companies have to explain their practices to the state, and particularly how they moderate user speech, then, as my colleague Daphne Keller has observed on Lawfare before, that opens the door to political pressure to change those practices to better suit the state’s preferences. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Moderator: Daphne Keller, Stanford Cyber Policy Center    DSA represents a shift to operational mandates compared to DMCA, Art. 17—thoughts? [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:47 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Moderator: Pamela Samuelson, Berkeley Law School From Notice-and-Takedown to Content Licensing and Filtering: How the Absence of UGC Monetization Rules Impacts Fundamental Rights        João Quintais, University of Amsterdam with Martin Senftleben, University of Amsterdam Human rights impact of the new rules. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 7:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Tutorial “The EU Digital Services Act – Overview and Central Features” General DSA Architecture and Approach      Martin Senftleben, University of Amsterdam Formally, the safe harbor system is still in place for mere conduit, caching and hosting services for third-party information they transmit and store. [read post]