Search for: "Daphne Keller" Results 21 - 40 of 189
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2023, 3:47 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Moderator: Pamela Samuelson, Berkeley Law School From Notice-and-Takedown to Content Licensing and Filtering: How the Absence of UGC Monetization Rules Impacts Fundamental Rights        João Quintais, University of Amsterdam with Martin Senftleben, University of Amsterdam Human rights impact of the new rules. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 7:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Tutorial “The EU Digital Services Act – Overview and Central Features” General DSA Architecture and Approach      Martin Senftleben, University of Amsterdam Formally, the safe harbor system is still in place for mere conduit, caching and hosting services for third-party information they transmit and store. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by JB
Nate Persily leads a discussion with Daphne Keller, Evelyn Douek, and myself about the two Section 230 cases before the Supreme Court, Google v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 2:01 am by Jen Patja Howell
Lawfare senior editor Quinta Jurecic moderated a panel that included Hany Farid, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, with a joint appointment in electrical engineering & computer sciences and the School of Information; Daphne Keller, the director of the Program on Platform Regulation at Stanford University’s Cyber Policy Center; Lawfare senior editor Alan Rozenshtein; and Lawfare editor-in-chief Benjamin Wittes. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:54 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
To talk about how these cases could change the Internet, I recently spoke by phone with Daphne Keller, who teaches at Stanford Law School and directs the program on platform regulation at Stanford’s Cyber Policy Center. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 11:54 am by Eugene Volokh
I should also personally tip my hat to Daphne Keller (Stanford), whose work opened my eyes to the § 230(f) argument, which I think is key to the case; § 230 expressly provides immunity from liability to "interactive computer service[s]" that include "access software provider[s]," which § 230(f) defines to include: a provider of software (including client or server software), or enabling tools that do any one or more of the following: (A) filter,… [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 2:37 pm by husovec
I definitely recommend all the pieces, especially Folkert Wilman’s piece on where the DSA liability chapter fits into existing case-law, Daphne Keller’s piece on likely global impact, Nicolo Zingales’ piece on the shift in the regulatory approach, Alessandro Mantelero’s piece on the human rights assessments, and Julian Jaursch’s piece on how to build a good national Digital Services Coordinator. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am by Eric Goldman
Some other services with over 50M MAUs (thanks to Daphne Keller’s sleuthing): Wikipedia, Glassdoor, Vimeo, and Steam. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 11:04 am by Aaron Mackey
The plaintiffs are represented by Davis, Wright Tremaine LLP, Walters Law Group, Daphne Keller, and EFF. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 7:59 am by Eugene Volokh
"] Posted by Cloudflare yesterday; I think this is the right decision, in part for reasons I sketch in my Reverse Spiderman Principle article (and see also this Twitter thread from Daphne Keller (Stanford)): Giving everyone the ability to sign up for our services online also reflects our view that cyberattacks not only should not be used for silencing vulnerable groups, but are not the appropriate mechanism for addressing problematic content online. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 2:25 pm by Matt Gluck
  Daphne Keller and Max Levy considered the possible avenues for platform transparency regulations—particularly in light of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, privacy concerns, and the First Amendment, among other principles. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 12:57 pm by Benjamin Pollard
Daphne Keller and Max Levy discussed the steps Congress should take going forward in setting policy guidance for platform transparency regulations. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:40 am by Christoph Schmon
In addition, as Daphne Keller points out, the impact of these laws can be managed by adjusting various ‘regulatory dials and knobs’: the scope of the law, what constitutes knowledge, notice and action processes and ‘good samaritan clauses’. [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:35 am by INFORRM
Director of the Program on Platform Regulation at Stanford’s Cyber Policy Center Daphne Keller’s testimony before the Senate hearing on platform transparency can be read here. [read post]
8 May 2022, 4:55 am by Katherine Pompilio
  Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast which features a conversation between Evelyn Douek and Daphne Keller about Europe’s Digital Services Act: Alex Engler argued that the Biden administration’s Declaration for the Future of the Internet is meant to persuade misbehaving democracies to stop internet transgressions. [read post]
6 May 2022, 10:49 am by Katherine Pompilio
  ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast which features a conversation between Evelyn Douek and Daphne Keller about Europe’s Digital Services Act. [read post]
5 May 2022, 2:01 am by Jen Patja Howell
This week on Arbiters of Truth, our series on the online information ecosystem, Evelyn Douek sat down with Daphne Keller, the director of the Program on Platform Regulation at the Stanford Cyber Policy Center, to get the rundown. [read post]
2 May 2022, 10:12 am by Katherine Pompilio
The committee will hear testimony from Brandon Silverman, founder of CrowdTangle; Nate Persily, professor at Stanford Law School; Daphne Keller, director of the Program on Platform Regulation at the Cyber Policy Center at Stanford University’s Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies; Jim Harper, nonresident senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute; and Jonathan Haidt, professor of ethical leadership at New York University Stern School of Business. [read post]