Search for: "Daphne Keller" Results 161 - 180 of 186
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2018, 11:09 am by Nick Feamster
Daphne Keller has a good summary of the legal landscape on intermediary liability. [read post]
22 May 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Columbia Journalism Review held an online round table to discuss the Facebook oversight board that brought together a range of experts including Emily Bell from the Tow Center at Columbia, Daphne Keller from Stanford, Rebecca MacKinnon from Ranking Digital Rights, and UN special rapporteur for freedom of expression David Kaye, among others. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
While the agreed text has not yet been made publicly available, we had a post about this and a post from Daphne Keller on the position of internet intermediaries. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
There were two interesting statements in open court in media law cases this week. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On 28 June 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada handed down judgment in the controversial case of Google Inc v Equustek Solutions  (2017 SCC 34) dismissing Google’s appeal against a worldwide injunction ordering it to remove websites from search results (2014 BCSC 1063). [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:35 am by INFORRM
Director of the Program on Platform Regulation at Stanford’s Cyber Policy Center Daphne Keller’s testimony before the Senate hearing on platform transparency can be read here. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Anonymous
This piece is exerpted from the Law, Borders, and Speech Conference Proceedings Volume. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 6:01 am by Jacob Schulz, Justin Sherman
Two years ago last week, a white supremacist walked into two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand and began spraying bullets upon worshippers, killing 51 people. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 9:59 pm by Morgan Weiland
A few weeks ago, after I published a blog post raising the question of what might happen to CDA 230 when internet intermediaries like Facebook invoke First Amendment protections – which civil liberties lawyers’ were calling on Facebook to do in the wake of the controversy over its trending newsfeed – I was fortunate enough to have a sustained email exchange with UCLA Law Professor Eugene Volokh. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 12:19 am by Riana Pfefferkorn
Indeed, as my colleague Daphne Keller explains, it appears that filtering requirements of some sort will now be the law of the land in the European Union thanks to a defamation case, though nobody knows what that fi [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 7:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Tutorial “The EU Digital Services Act – Overview and Central Features” General DSA Architecture and Approach      Martin Senftleben, University of Amsterdam Formally, the safe harbor system is still in place for mere conduit, caching and hosting services for third-party information they transmit and store. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
It was a busy media law week at the Royal Courts of Justice, with the seventh week of the Leveson Inquiry and the settlement of 37 phone hacking cases against News International. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 9:02 pm by Kelsey M. Mackin
MYERS FL MURRELLS INLET HO SC ACWORTH GA AIKEN SC ALABASTER AL ALACHUA FL ALBANY GA ALPHARETTA GA ALTAMONTE SPRINGS FL ANDERSON SC ANTIOCH TN APEX NC APOLLO BEACH FL APOPKA FL ARCADIA FL ASHEVILLE NC ATHENS AL ATHENS GA ATLANTA GA AUBURN AL AUBURNDALE FL AUGUSTA GA AVENTURA FL BARTOW FL BEAUFORT SC BELLEAIR BLUFFS FL BESSEMER AL BETHLEHEM GA BIRMINGHAM AL BLUFFTON SC BOCA RATON FL BONAIRE GA BONITA SPRINGS FL BOONE NC BOYNTON BEACH FL BRADENTON FL BRANDON FL BRASELTON GA BRENTWOOD TN BROOKSVILLE FL… [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 12:52 pm by Genevieve Lakier
For years now, scholars have expressed alarm at the tendency of government officials to use informal means, rather than democratically enacted laws, to pressure the social media companies to take down what they consider to be harmful or offensive speech. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 12:42 pm by Riana Pfefferkorn
Just as pretty much everybody predicted, SESTA/FOSTA has turned out to endanger sex workers instead of protecting them, and is currently being challenged as unconstitutional in federal court (including by my colleague Daphne Keller). [read post]