Search for: "Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp" Results 1 - 20 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2006, 5:46 am
The case is Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 8:39 am by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003) to find that plaintiff’s Lanham Act claim failed. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 4:40 pm
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003).On Jan. 28, Judge Marsha Pechman denied the motion. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:21 pm by tlcasagrande
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003), holding that the defendant’s knock offs amounted to “reverse passing off” under the Lanham Act. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 9:39 am by Mike
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., (U.S. 2003) is applicable here. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 9:17 pm by Michael Atkins
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003), barred plaintiff’s claims. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 12:00 am
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. precluded such a claim under § 43(a)(1)(A). [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 1:09 pm
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003), a claim for reverse passing off cannot be brought to prevent the copying of intellectual property. [read post]
8 May 2012, 12:25 pm by Dennis Crouch
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003) and TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:00 pm by Stacia Lay
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003), by preventing the Betty Boop character from ever entering the public domain. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp (in which the Supreme Court held that a trademark claim could not be used to bar a public domain reproduction). [read post]