Search for: "Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp" Results 21 - 40 of 40
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2011, 2:29 pm by Tom Casagrande
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003)—another decision that neither party had cited or discussed. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 9:39 am by Mike
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., (U.S. 2003) is applicable here. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:21 pm by tlcasagrande
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003), holding that the defendant’s knock offs amounted to “reverse passing off” under the Lanham Act. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 7:39 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 361 F.3d 312, 318 (6th Cir. 2004) (noting that the standard for originality is quite low and that the “vast majority of works make the grade quite easily”) (quoting Feist, 499 U.S. at 361). [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 3:39 am by R. David Donoghue
Lanham Act Claims Citing the Supreme Court's Dastar Corp. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 10:34 pm
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 5:13 pm by Tom W. Bell
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation that, once a work has fallen into the public domain, its former copyright holder cannot use federal unfair competition law to demand credit from those who reuse the work. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 3:00 pm
It also provides a potential end-run around the Supreme Court's decision in Dastar Corp. v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003), which declined to extend Lanham Act protection to removal of the original production company's name when re-distributing a public domain television series. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:15 pm
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 4:40 pm
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003).On Jan. 28, Judge Marsha Pechman denied the motion. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 5:46 am
The case is Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2006, 5:45 am
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003) was one of the most important decisions for copyright, given its affirmation of the public domain and the right to use public domain works without attribution. [read post]