Search for: "Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 245
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2020, 12:41 pm by Jim Robinson
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and the testimony is helpful to the trier of fact to understand the evidence through specialized, scientific, or technical expertise. [read post]
13 May 2020, 2:03 am by Schachtman
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 592 n.10 (1993). [3]  Id., citing Bourjaily v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am by Schachtman
That was the tradition that stood in active need of reform when Daubert was decided in 1993. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:47 am by Schachtman
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [2]  Frye v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 5:00 am by Anjelica Cappellino
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) or Frye v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 9:00 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and thus should not have been admitted nor relied upon. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm by Schachtman
The phosphodiesterases 5 inhibitor medications (PDE5i) seem to arouse the litigation propensities of the lawsuit industry. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:00 am by Anjelica Cappellino
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) will consider a non-exhaustive list of factors such as the expert’s methodology and reliability. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
[vi]And then-Justice Rehnquist might have joined the majority in Washington v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 5:00 am by Anjelica Cappellino
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) (which sets forth an enumerated list of factors, including general acceptance within the scientific community, to consider when evaluating an expert’s opinion). [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 8:53 am by Schachtman
Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 595 (1993). [8]  Bench Book at 10. [9]  Id. at 10. [10]  Id. at 10. [11] See State Justice Institute Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. ch. 113, 42 U.S.C. [read post]