Search for: "Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2025, 9:13 am
Supreme Court case Daubert v. [read post]
13 Mar 2025, 6:47 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), in its allowance of testimony from EcoFactor’s damages expert assigning a per-unit royalty rate to the three licenses in evidence in this case. [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 11:27 am
The Daubert case was decided over 30 years ago, based upon a version of a congressionally approved rule that is no longer in effect.[4] The holding of the case was simply that Congress, in enacting the original Rule 702, did not incorporate the holding of Frye v. [read post]
5 Nov 2024, 6:44 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 11:37 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), in allowing testimony from EcoFactor's damages expert. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 8:00 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 7:16 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, it requires that expert testimony be both relevant and reliable. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 7:16 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, it requires that expert testimony be both relevant and reliable. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 6:31 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993). [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:00 pm
Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc. (1993) 509 U.S. 579, 593 (Daubert); see also Primiano v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:07 pm
This would be a Scott v. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 2:43 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 113 S.Ct. 2786 (1993), held that the “Frye standard,” i.e., the long dominant legal standard that “expert” testimony must have “general acceptance” in the scientific community or other relevant areas of knowledge, was no longer the legal standard for admitting expert testimony in evidence. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,[2] The Supreme Court suggested that peer review of studies relied upon by a challenged expert witness should be a factor in determining the admissibility of that expert witness’s opinion. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
In Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 4:30 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (1993), on the standards for expert testimony, with 24 departing states, United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), legal scholars, judges, and lawyers have struggled with the structure and validity of expert opinion on specific causation. [read post]
7 May 2022, 5:01 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
3 May 2022, 10:28 am
In Daubert v. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 6:24 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), Fed.Rules, Evid.Rules 104(a), 702. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 4:33 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993).Where does the universe of disability terminate? [read post]
