Search for: "Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 215
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2024, 2:00 pm
Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc. (1993) 509 U.S. 579, 593 (Daubert); see also Primiano v. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 2:43 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 113 S.Ct. 2786 (1993), held that the “Frye standard,” i.e., the long dominant legal standard that “expert” testimony must have “general acceptance” in the scientific community or other relevant areas of knowledge, was no longer the legal standard for admitting expert testimony in evidence. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm by admin
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,[2] The Supreme Court suggested that peer review of studies relied upon by a challenged expert witness should be a factor in determining the admissibility of that expert witness’s opinion. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (1993), on the standards for expert testimony, with 24 departing states, United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), legal scholars, judges, and lawyers have struggled with the structure and validity of expert opinion on specific causation. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 6:24 pm by Jon L. Gelman
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), Fed.Rules, Evid.Rules 104(a), 702. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 4:33 am by Jon L. Gelman
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993).Where does the universe of disability terminate? [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:29 pm by admin
As a result, so-called Daubert hearings began taking place in district courts around the country, in parallel with other centralized proceedings in MDL 926. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 5:00 am by William Sinclair
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), the Frye test was the predominant standard for the admissibility of scientific evidence in state and federal courts. [read post]