Search for: "Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc."
Results 81 - 100
of 204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 599 (1993) (Rehnquist, C.J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (‘‘the various briefs filed in this case … deal with definitions of scientific knowledge, scientific method, scientific validity, and peer review—in short, matters far afield from the expertise of judges’’); Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. of America v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:10 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and Rule 702, Fed. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals regarding important expert testimony requires the appellate court to order a new trial, regardless of whether there was actually any substantive error in the expert testimony heard or not heard by the jury. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:12 pm
AstenJohnson, Inc. 13-1252 Issue: Whether, in a federal jury case, a district judge’s procedural failure to make detailed findings under Daubert v. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 7:45 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and Wilt v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 9:36 am
Breg Inc., 613 F.3d 1329, 1342 (11th Cir. 2010); see also Norris v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 89 F.3d 594, 596-98 (9th Cir. 1996) (affirming exclusion of Dr. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 6:57 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 11:04 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:27 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the United States Supreme Court held for the first time that, to be admissible, scientific evidence must be both scientifically valid and properly applicable to the facts at issue in the case. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:27 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the United States Supreme Court held for the first time that, to be admissible, scientific evidence must be both scientifically valid and properly applicable to the facts at issue in the case. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:21 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:18 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:22 am
Merrel Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993) 509 U.S. 579. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:57 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 599 (1993) (Rehnquist, C.J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (“the various briefs filed in this case … deal with definitions of scientific knowledge, scientific method, scientific validity, and peer review—in short, matters far afield from the expertise of judges”); Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. [read post]
