Search for: "Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc." Results 121 - 140 of 292
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2017, 9:00 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), General Electric Co. v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 10:59 am by Michael Talve
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (509 U.S. 579, 589, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 [1993]).Admissibility Ruling:U.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:10 am by Kristin Casler
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 [1993]) by resolving doubts in favor of keeping the testimony out and relying upon its own assessment of the correctness of the expert opinions, the panel said. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 1:01 pm by Jeralyn
Dow Merrell Pharmaceuticals, Inc., which prohibit the use of inaccurate, nonspecific tests and/or conclusory reports because they do not prove the presence of marijuana in a seized substance. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 6:24 pm by Jon L. Gelman
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), Fed.Rules, Evid.Rules 104(a), 702. [read post]
15 May 2014, 9:36 am by Matthew A. Reed
Breg Inc., 613 F.3d 1329, 1342 (11th Cir. 2010); see also Norris v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:27 pm by Alex Craigie
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the United States Supreme Court held for the first time that, to be admissible, scientific evidence must be both scientifically valid and properly applicable to the facts at issue in the case. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 6:57 am by Bill Marler
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:27 pm by Gerald L. Maatman, Jr.
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), in analyzing the expert presentations relating to the Rule 23 requirements, Plaintiffs contend that the Ninth Circuit found this to be no abuse of discretion, and that it did not matter because the district court judge was "guided by Daubert," concluded that the expert opinions were "based on valid principles," and were "sufficiently probative" of the Rule 23… [read post]