Search for: "Davenport v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
In the store’s published FAQ, Dumb Starbucks state they are not affiliated in any way with Starbucks Corporation: “We are simply using their name and logo for marketing purposes”. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 1:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:35 am
A recently published decision, Mendoza v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 8:00 am
Global - Patents Open Innovation Network unveils Linux Defenders to protect open source from patent suits by establishing prior art and participating in patent peer review (Ars Technica) (Securing Innovation) Bulgaria RARBG, ArenaBG and other BitTorrent trackers forced to shut down or relocate following police action (TorrentFreak) (TorrentFreak) Cameroon Third-level domain names come to Cameroon (Afro-IP) Canada Copyright Board… [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:35 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Davenport, 596 U. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 7:32 am
(written by Justice Adrienne Albrecht and joined by Justices Lance Peterson and Linda Davenport; see also Drake v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
” See generally Davenport v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:59 am
Boyd v. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 12:00 am
Lincoln’s Trident: The West Gulf Blockading Squadron during the Civil War; William Davenport Mercer’s Diminishing the Bill of Rights: Barron v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 11:51 am
In Davenport v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:39 pm
’” (Citing from Hasson v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 5:51 pm
Division II Davenport v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
June 23, 2011) (allegation that defendant “failed to train, warn or educate” physicians failed to state a plausible claim because no such duty exists); Lemon v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 3:44 am
Davenport. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:04 am
American Atheists, 10-1276, and Davenport v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 11:53 am
She stated that during the initial visual comparison, the judge may disregard similarities on the basis that they are "too commonplace, unoriginal or consist of general ideas", before undertaking a detailed analysis of the works. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:38 am
Lombardi, Walsh, Wakeman, Harrison, Amodeo & Davenport, P.C. v American Guar. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:47 am
Lombardi, Walsh, Wakeman, Harrison, Amodeo & Davenport, P.C. v American Guar. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:20 pm
Scott Nelson has this post at the Consumer Law & Policy Blog about the Court's unanimous decision in Watson v. [read post]
