Search for: "David Engstrom"
Results 61 - 80
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2021, 6:29 pm
Symposium Program HEC ParisJouy-en-JosasDAY 1WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2021Building T – Room 206Joint Event with HEC Data Day5.30 pm– 6.30pmOpening KeynoteThe Automated StateDavid Engstrom (Stanford University)Chair: David Restrepo Amariles (HEC Paris)6.30pm – CocktailDAY 2THURSDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2021Building S, Amphi BellonWELCOME AND REGISTRATION8.30 am – 9.00am9.00am – 9.15amIntroductory KeynoteLaw in our SocietyDavid Restrepo… [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:04 am
Commentary on the case comes from David Freeman Engstrom, who in The National Law Journal (subscription or registration may be required) describes the case as “notable because it embodies much of what’s wrong with how we as a society talk about, and our elected leaders debate, the role of lawyers and litigation in our system of government. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 6:04 pm
Equally important, Stanford Law School has one of the strongest faculty in empirical legal studies, including John Donohue, Deborah Hensler, Jeff Strnad, Dan Ho, Dan Kessler, Alison Morantz, David Engstrom, Mark Kelman, Lawrence Friedman, and others making this project a natural fit for Stanford. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Engstrom v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Engstrom v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 6:12 am
The government also draws support from numerous amici, including most notably Stanford law professor David Engstrom, the author of pathbreaking empirical studies about the FCA. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
Novak (2013) (also available in Preventing Regulatory Capture: Special Interest Influence and How to Limit it edited by Daniel Carpenter and David Moss) (providing a critical look at the emergence of regulatory capture in the United States) Corralling Capture by David Freeman Engstrom (2013) (calling for more rigor in how we define and frame the issue of regulatory capture) Enlightened Regulatory Capture by David Thaw (2014) (exploring how regulatory capture can… [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:20 am
In the following guest post, Stanford Law School Professor David Engstrom, who filed an amicus brief in the case, takes a look at the IndyMac case and its implications for class action securities litigation. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 5:15 am
LawNext Podcast: A Deep Dive into the First Comprehensive Study of Reg Reforms in Arizona and Utah with Stanford’s David Engstrom and Lucy Ricca. [read post]
13 May 2019, 12:42 pm
As David Engstrom’s preview explained, the 11th Circuit held that relators can invoke Section 3731(b)(2) in suits in which the United States is not a party and that Section 3731(b)(2)’s three-year limitations period does not begin until the government learns of the alleged fraud, regardless of when the relator discovers it. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am
Escobar, in which the Court ruled on the circumstances in which the implied false certification theory can be a basis for liability under the False Claims Act, comes from Joan Krause, who at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights suggests that, although “both parties quickly claimed victory, in reality the decision is likely to satisfy no one and to raise as many questions as it answers”; Richard Samp, who at the Washington Legal Foundation’s Legal Pulse concludes that, although the… [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 2:19 pm
As explained in David Engstrom’s preview, the law’s original statute of limitations, Section 3731(b)(1), requires lawsuits to be filed within six years of the alleged fraud. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am
Commentary on Epic Systems comes from Joel Nolette at The Least Dangerous Blog, David Freeman Engstrom in an op-ed for The New York Times, and Arthur Bryant in an op-ed for The National Law Journal. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:15 am
Sutton’s article Native Americans and Discriminatory Administration with Facially Neutral Rules is cited in the following article: Christina Isabel Ceballos, David Freeman Engstrom, & Daniel E. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:11 am
Here, Stanford Law Professor David Freeman Engstrom, an expert in administrative law, and John Priddy, a member of the Stanford Law School class of 2023, discuss the Court’s ruling and its implications for climate policy and the future of the administrative state. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 9:58 pm
" Evan Engstrom, policy director, Engine: "Many of the startups we work with operate in global markets and depend on an international customer base to thrive. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
[Blogger's note: Today's post is authored jointly by Angelo A. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
David L. [read post]
25 May 2021, 9:05 pm
The committee drew on two ACUS commissioned reports to inform the committee’s research: one report by law professors Daniel Ho, David Freeman Engstrom, Catherine Sharkey, and Supreme Court of California Justice Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar, and the other report by University of Pennsylvania law professor Cary Coglianese. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 5:31 am
The comprehensive report was written by David Freeman Engstrom, co-director of the Deborah L. [read post]
