Search for: "David Fontana"
Results 41 - 60
of 148
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2017, 4:38 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, David Fontana unpacks the result of a recent poll on the Supreme Court conducted by C-SPAN and PBS. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 3:48 pm
My fellow blogger, David Fontana, recently discussed the topic of law professor neutrality in our political moment. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 10:42 am
Welcome to our March visitors: Seth Cavis (UC-Irvine), David Fontana (George Washington), Jack Harrison (Northern Kentucky-Chase), and Brad Snyder (Wisconsin). [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 11:38 am
San Diego Vandalism, Property Crimes, and Criminal Defense Lawyer The Law Offices of David M. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
David Souter, for example, has left his papers to the New Hampshire Historical Society in Concord, N.H., not to be opened until fifty years after his death. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:14 am
In fact, I don’t think I can read as fast as David Fontana can blog. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:10 am
” Commentary on the decision comes from David Fontana, who focuses on Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s dissent at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 11:00 am
David Fontana has this post at PrawfsBlawg, commending this book by David Dagan and Steven Teles for explaining "why many conservatives changed their mind about criminal justice issues. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:15 am
” Commentary relating to the death of Justice Antonin Scalia and the dynamics on the eight-member Court comes from David Fontana in a series of posts (here, here, and here) at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:58 am
Commentary related to the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, the nomination of Chief Judge Merrick Garland to succeed him, and Supreme Court nominations generally comes from David Fontana at PrawfsBlawg, Geoffrey Stone and Todd Henderson at a panel (video) moderated by journalist Lynn Sweet, and the editorial board of The Washington Post. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 3:08 am
., when I actually have to get cracking on my summer research projects), we welcome our new visitors for the month: Hadar Aviram (UC Hastings), David Fontana (George Washington) Ajay Mehrotra (American bar Foundation), Andra Robertson (Case Western), and John Stinneford (Florida). [read post]
15 May 2016, 3:56 am
Otros escritores que han enviado cartas al gobernador incluyen Nicholas Pileggi, Shari Springer Berman, Robin Thede, Andrew Bergman, Tom Fontana, Sarah Treem, Lucy Alibar, Tony Gilroy, Beau Willimon, Matt Williams, Richard LaGravenese, Julie Martin, Rebecca Miller, Anya Epstein, David Simon, Theresa Rebeck y Michael H. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 10:17 am
Fontana & David Keeshan, The Law of Search and Seizure in Canada, 9th ed. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:44 pm
" Law professor David Fontana and Ian Bassin have this jurisprudence essay online at Slate. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 6:34 am
" Law professor David Fontana has this essay online today at The Daily Beast. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 11:08 am
" Law professor David Fontana has this essay online today at The Daily Beast. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
Smith, Lauren Fontana, Susannah William Pollvogt & Tanya Washington, Brief of Amici Curiae Scholars of the Constitutional Rights of Children in Support of Petitioners in Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Commentary comes from Leslie Griffin at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, James Gottry at The Hill, Thomas Berg at America, Gregory Lipper at casetext, Zac Bears at The Double Standard, David Fontana at Slate, Jessica Mason Pieklo at RH Reality Check, Robert Tuttle and Ira Lupu at Cornerstone, Elizabeth Wydra at Reuters, Paul Horwitz and Howard Wasserman (in three posts) at PrawfsBlawg, and Ian Millhiser at Think Progress. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
" Law professor David Fontana has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 6:55 am
And at the "PostEverything" blog of The Washington Post, law professors David Fontana and Donald Braman have an entry titled "John Roberts says people want the 'democratic process' to decide gay marriage; He's wrong; People don't mind if the court decides our major constitutional issues. [read post]
