Search for: "David Gans" Results 61 - 80 of 250
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2016, 1:33 pm by Andrew Hamm
” Speakers will include Steven Bradbury, David Gans, Deepak Gupta, Ajmel Quereshi, and Jeffrey Wall; Amanda Frost will serve as moderator. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 5:18 am
"Justice Kennedy, The First Amendment, and Partisan Gerrymandering": David Gans has this post at the "Take Care" blog. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:20 am by Ilya Somin
University of Texas, David Gans and UCLA law professor Adam Winkler take conservative originalist opponents of affirmative action to task for ignoring originalism in their arguments against the constitutionality of racial preferences for minorities. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 12:20 pm by Rick Hasen
I also received via email this statement from David Gans of the Constitutional Accountability Center: “Judge Griffiths, who may well be the deciding vote here, appropriately emphasized that the text of the Constitution explicitly gives Congress power to address voting discrimination.  [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 7:48 am by NCC Staff
David Gans of the Constitutional Accountability Center and the CATO Institute’s Ilya Shapiro joined Jeffrey Rosen for a detailed discussion on a hot constitutional issue. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
In a post on Balkinization, David Gans discusses the scholars’ brief in Fisher v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:50 pm by Will Baude
(Will Baude) I’ve seen some skeptical responses to my previous post about corporations and free exercise, of which Dahlia Lithwick’s and David Gans’s are emblematic. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:41 am by Roger Clegg
In their post, David Gans and Adam Winkler argue that, because Congress passed a number of bills aimed at helping African Americans prior to the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, therefore it is consistent with the “original meaning” of the Fourteenth Amendment for the University of Texas to give racial preferences to Latinos and blacks over Asians and whites in 2012. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  More.In case you missed David Gans's description on Balkinization of the scholar's brief in Fisher v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 7:13 am by Amy Howe
  At the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, David Gans addresses (and disputes) the idea that “conservatives have been bullied” in the same-sex marriage cases, while in the Boston Globe Lisa Keen discusses the amicus brief filed in the case by Massachusetts. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:37 pm
Marc Foggin, Managing Shared Natural Heritages: Towards More Participatory Models of Protected Area Management in Western China David A. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:58 pm by David Kopel
David Gans (at Balkinization) and Charles Fried (testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee) agree that the answer is “yes.” [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:56 am by Amy Howe
  At Big Think, Steven Mazie discusses what he describes as the alliance of “strange bedfellows” supporting Hobby Lobby and Conestoga, the challengers in the case, while at Balkinization David Gans urges the Court to “recognize that the rights of Hobby Lobby’s thousands of employees – who have deeply held beliefs and convictions of their own – are at stake here, too. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 12:08 pm by David H. Gans
David Gans is the Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights, and Citizenship Program at Constitutional Accountability Center. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:14 pm
A Slate article by David Gans makes much of the fact that business groups haven’t stood up to support Hobby Lobby’s religious exemption claims: This spring, the Supreme Court will decide — for the first time in our nation’s history — whether secular, for-profit corporations are entitled to invoke the constitutional guarantee of the free exercise of religion. [read post]