Search for: "David Gans"
Results 61 - 80
of 285
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2019, 3:50 am
Desahuciada por los matasanos de la corte, la condesa salvó la vida y ganó fama merced a la corteza pulverizada de un árbol andino, que un cura jesuita le dio. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 3:40 am
” At the Constitutional Accountability Center blog, David Gans weighs in on Department of Commerce v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
In an op-ed at BuzzFeed.News, David Gans writes that “Chief Justice Roberts has positioned himself as the Court’s most insistent defender of First Amendment freedoms,” and these “cases will test whether Roberts deserves that accolade. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 5:58 am
Brownstein, David A. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
David M. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 4:18 am
” Additional commentary on the nomination comes from David Gans in an op-ed for the Bangor Daily News. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 4:38 pm
” At Take Care, David Gans writes that the “legacy of this Amendment, its purpose, and its continuing, urgent relevance show exactly how high the stakes for this nominee and the future of the Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am
For the Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports that “[t]he majority rejected arguments that Trump overstepped his presidential authority and that his targeting of Muslim-majority countries violated the Constitution’s ban on religious discrimination. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 8:14 am
David H. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 4:22 am
” At Take Care, David Gans weighs in on Trump v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am
” At Take Care, David Gans argues that “[u]nder our Constitution, it is the Supreme Court’s responsibility to check state electoral abuses and ensure that voters choose their representatives, not the other way around. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 4:34 am
” At Take Care, David Gans weighs in on the case, arguing that the centers’ “unforgiving view of the First Amendment—which has never been the law and is badly out of step with decisions such as Citizens United—would gut a vast array of disclosure laws and leave consumers in the dark about critically important matters. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 4:12 am
” Additional commentary comes from Douglas NeJaime and Reva Siegel, also at Take Care, David Gans, completing the Take Care trifecta, Rick Hills at PrawfsBlawg, and Asher Steinberg at The Narrowest Grounds, who offers a “dialogue in the form of an oral argument … in order to help clarify” “whether wedding cake and wedding cake-baking are speech, and what they express if they are. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:21 am
Commentary comes from the baker, Jack Phillips, in an op-ed for USA Today, Kristen Waggoner in an op-ed for The Washington Times, Jim Campbell in an op-ed for AZCentral, Michael Farris in an op-ed for Fox News, James Gottry in an op-ed for The Denver Post, Ross Runkel at his eponymous blog, Ryan Lockman at Lock Law Blog, Dorothy Samuels at The American Prospect, Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Brian Miller at Quillette, David Gans at Take Care, who… [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 3:58 am
” At Slate, David Gans explains why, although all eyes have been on Justice Anthony Kennedy as the potential swing vote in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 8:22 pm
" David H. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 3:41 am
” In an op-ed for the Akron Beacon Journal, David Gans contends that “Ohio’s voter purge [at issue in Husted v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 5:18 am
"Justice Kennedy, The First Amendment, and Partisan Gerrymandering": David Gans has this post at the "Take Care" blog. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:19 am
At Take Care, David Gans suggests that, based on the tenor of the argument, “it seems that the Justices inclined to uphold partisan gerrymandering will face an uphill battle to convince Justice Kennedy that Wisconsin’s extreme partisan gerrymander can be squared with the First Amendment principles Kennedy holds dear. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:17 am
” Commentary on the new Supreme Court term comes from Elizabeth Wydra in an op-ed for the Sun-Sentinel, David Gans at Balkinization, and Bill Blum at Truthdig, who observes that “[a]fter moving to the political center the past three terms, the Supreme Court is poised to take a turn back to the right in its new session,” and that the “big question is how abrupt and sharp the turn will be. [read post]
