Search for: "David Gans" Results 81 - 100 of 284
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2017, 3:41 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for the Akron Beacon Journal, David Gans contends that “Ohio’s voter purge [at issue in Husted v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 5:18 am
"Justice Kennedy, The First Amendment, and Partisan Gerrymandering": David Gans has this post at the "Take Care" blog. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
At Take Care, David Gans suggests that, based on the tenor of the argument, “it seems that the Justices inclined to uphold partisan gerrymandering will face an uphill battle to convince Justice Kennedy that Wisconsin’s extreme partisan gerrymander can be squared with the First Amendment principles Kennedy holds dear. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary on the new Supreme Court term comes from Elizabeth Wydra in an op-ed for the Sun-Sentinel, David Gans at Balkinization, and Bill Blum at Truthdig, who observes that “[a]fter moving to the political center the past three terms, the Supreme Court is poised to take a turn back to the right in its new session,” and that the “big question is how abrupt and sharp the turn will be. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Jed Shugerman’s apology, Adam Liptak] From Usery to Garcia to commandeering: better for SCOTUS to respect states’ core sovereignty [Nick Dranias, Liberty and Law] Cato Unbound roundtable on religious liberty with Ilya Shapiro, David Gans, Robin Fretwell Wilson, and K. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 8:26 pm
"The Supreme Court's New Term": David Gans has this post at the "Balkinization" blog. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 11:22 am by David Gans
    David Gans is the Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights & Citizenship Program at the Constitutional Accountability Center. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
” At Take Care, David Gans weighs in on Monday’s decision in Ziglar v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:29 pm by Andrew Hamm
Additional commentary on Gorsuch’s nomination comes from Elizabeth Wydra for The Hill, David Gans for the Waco Tribune-Herald (also New Republic), and Akhil Reed Amar for The New York Times, Mark Gitenstein for The Washington Post, Kenneth Jost for his eponymous blog, Leah Litman at Take Care, who also writes a second piece with Amir Ali for Take Care, Ryan Black and Ryan Owens for The Washington Post, David Brock from Politico Magazine, Sen. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:18 am by Edith Roberts
David Gans in The New Republic argues that Hernández offers the court  “an important opportunity to reaffirm its core constitutional role of keeping the political branches in check, vindicating individual rights, and ensuring that no one is above the law,” and predicts that this “Supreme Court case will come down, as so many do, to Justice Anthony Kennedy. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 1:33 pm by Andrew Hamm
” Speakers will include Steven Bradbury, David Gans, Deepak Gupta, Ajmel Quereshi, and Jeffrey Wall; Amanda Frost will serve as moderator. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 5:21 am by Amy Howe
” In an op-ed for The Atlantic, David Gans suggests that the late Justice Antonin Scalia may have had “perhaps his greatest impact” “writing or joining opinions that radically changed the law in a way that made it harder for individuals to have their day in court to vindicate their federal rights. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:05 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary supportive of the decision comes from David Gans at Balkinization; critical commentary comes from Terrence Pell at USA Today and Joshua Thompson at Forbes, And at Slate, Dahlia Lithwick concludes that, although the decision is “a loss for Alito and Clarence Thomas and the chief justice on affirmative action,” there is also “mass confusion about what it all means in any concrete terms. [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:52 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary comes from David Gans, who at Balkinization argues that “[l]eaving the Supreme Court with only eight members—and unable to decide some of the most important cases that come before it—threatens the Court’s ability to do its job. [read post]