Search for: "David Gans" Results 141 - 160 of 285
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2014, 4:38 am by Amy Howe
”   In an op-ed for The (Louisville) Courier-Journal, David Gans argues that the ruling “dealt another blow to our Constitution’s promise of democracy” and “open[s] the door to a whole host of new challenges to state and federal contribution limits, including federal limits on soft money previously upheld by the justices. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:55 am by Amy Howe
At the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History blog, David H. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:24 am by Cormac Early
University of Texas at Austin continues with contributions from David Gans and Adam Winkler, Walter Weber, and Gail Heriot and John Eastman. [read post]
19 May 2016, 4:06 am by Amy Howe
Robins, in which the Court sent a Virginia man’s lawsuit against the search engine Spokeo back to the Ninth Circuit, comes from David Gans at Casetext and Andrew Pincus at Mayer Brown’s Class Defense Blog. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 12:00 pm
  That’s why we took notice of a recent New York Times article by David Cay Johnston which made an excellent case for informing your beneficiaries about the particulars of your estate plan. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:37 am by Kali Borkoski
Briefly noted: In an article posted on both the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text & History blog and Balkinization, David Gans discusses an exchange between Justices Alito and Scalia regarding originalism – specifically, Justice’s Alito’s comment that Justice Scalia wanted to know “what James Madison thought about video games” – during Tuesday’s oral argument in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:04 am by Amy Howe
  At Balkinization, David Gans discusses originalism and same-sex marriage, arguing that the “Framers made a conscious decision to write the Fourteenth Amendment as a broad guarantee of equality for all, preventing majorities in the states from discriminating against any person or group of persons. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
For the Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports that “[t]he majority rejected arguments that Trump overstepped his presidential authority and that his targeting of Muslim-majority countries violated the Constitution’s ban on religious discrimination. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 6:43 am by Rachel Sachs
At Balkinization, David Gans of the Constitutional Accountability Center summarizes the brief filed by his organization and a group of prominent constitutional law scholars in support of the university. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional commentary on the nomination comes from David Gans in an op-ed for the Bangor Daily News. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 3:41 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for the Akron Beacon Journal, David Gans contends that “Ohio’s voter purge [at issue in Husted v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 6:17 am by Marissa Miller
At the Constitutional Accountability Center, David Gans responds to Clegg’s post, countering that “the Voting Rights Act is not simply about increasing African American voter turnout, but about preventing all forms of voting discrimination. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 6:20 am by Cormac Early
At Balkinization, David Gans of the Constitutional Accountability Center discusses an amicus brief filed by constitutional law scholars in Shelby County v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 11:26 am by David Gans
  David Gans is the Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights and Citizenship Program at the Constitutional Accountability Center and a co-author of CAC's brief in Evenwel v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 11:55 am by David Gans
 David Gans is the Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights & Citizenship Program at the Constitutional Accountability Center. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 11:34 am by David Gans
      David Gans is the Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights & Citizenship Program at the Constitutional Accountability Center and a co-author of CAC's brief in Shelby County. [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 5:06 am by Vishnu Kannan
David Priess and Margaret Taylor addressed the recent confusion over impeachment proceedings. [read post]