Search for: "David Gans"
Results 161 - 180
of 275
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2021, 6:27 am
” Online at Slate, David H. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:13 am
Additional commentary comes from Garrett Epps at The Atlantic, Adam Feldman at Empirical SCOTUS, Marci Hamilton at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Timothy Jost at Health Affairs Blog, Alison Howard at CNS News, Marty Lederman at Balkinization, Justin Sadowsky at Dubitante, David Gans at New Republic, and Sister Simone Campbell in an op-ed for CNN. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 3:11 am
” In the New Republic, David Gans argues that, if Justice Anthony Kennedy were to apply his reasoning from last Term’s ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:43 pm
David Gans is the Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights & Citizenship Program at the Constitutional Accountability Center. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 10:13 am
David H. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 7:29 am
Commentary on yesterday’s argument comes from Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Jonathan Adler at the National Review’s Bench Memos, and David Gans at the New Republic. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 4:35 am
” The National Constitution Center’s Jeffrey Rosen spoke with David Gans and Ilya Shapiro about the case; that interview is available in a podcast. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 8:57 am
Disclosure: Through my consulting firm CopyByte I provide DMCA takedown services and content enforcement. 2: Microsoft Teams Up with European News Publishers to Make Google and Facebook Squirm Next up today, David Meyer at Fortune reports that, even as Facebook and Google are battling with publishers in the European Union and Australia over whether they should pay for news in search results, Microsoft is teaming with news publishers to call for even stronger regulations. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:42 am
” Commentary comes from Leslie Griffin at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, David Gans at the Detroit Free Press, Gene Schaerr at the National Review’s Bench Memos and The Daily Signal, Dawn Stefanowicz at The Public Discourse, Patrick Fagan at The Stream, and Kenneth Jost at Jost on Justice. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:58 am
At Balkinization, David Gans discusses the amicus brief that the Constitutional Accountability Center filed in Fisher v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 7:53 am
Los comentarios que ha venido dando su equipo económico, especialmente Pedro Francke, los han recibido positivamente" David Tuesta ob cit. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 6:03 am
Gans and Elizabeth B. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 3:40 am
” At the Constitutional Accountability Center blog, David Gans weighs in on Department of Commerce v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 4:34 am
” At Take Care, David Gans weighs in on the case, arguing that the centers’ “unforgiving view of the First Amendment—which has never been the law and is badly out of step with decisions such as Citizens United—would gut a vast array of disclosure laws and leave consumers in the dark about critically important matters. [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:52 am
Commentary comes from David Gans, who at Balkinization argues that “[l]eaving the Supreme Court with only eight members—and unable to decide some of the most important cases that come before it—threatens the Court’s ability to do its job. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:59 am
" ACSblog adds two more installments to its debate on the constitutional rights of corporations between David Gans of the Constitutional Accountability Center and Michael Greve of the American Enterprise Institute. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:09 am
Gans, who criticizes the decision in an op-ed for the Detroit Free Press. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:43 am
., in which the Court held that a Vermont law which prohibits the commercial use of information about physicians’ prescribing habits is unconstitutional, David Gans argues at Balkinization that the decision “throws commercial speech doctrine into a state of considerable confusion,” because it has “undermined [Central Hudson] by introducing a new, undefined, yet clearly stricter standard of review. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
Gans responds to Hasen, criticizing what he characterizes as Hasen’s “faulty originalism. [read post]
