Search for: "David Gans"
Results 161 - 180
of 284
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2014, 5:50 am
” In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, David H. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 9:24 pm
Gans argues: This spring, the Supreme Court will decide—for the first time in our nation’s history—whether secular, for-profit corporations are entitled to invoke the constitutional guarantee of the... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am
” And at the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, David Gans compares legislation in Arizona and Kansas with the challenges to the Affordable Care Act’s contraception mandate, arguing that “[t]he efforts to give businesses a right to deny women access to contraceptive coverage and to legalize discrimination against gay men and lesbians are joined at the hip. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:26 am
At the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, David H. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 12:16 am
Nelson Tebbe, Richard Schragger, and Micah Schwartzman, Hobby Lobby and the Establishment Clause, Part III: Reconciling Amos and Cutter Nelson Tebbe, Richard Schragger, and Micah Schwartzman, Hobby Lobby and the Establishment Clause: Gedicks and the Government David Gans, Can Corporations Exercise Religion? [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 1:53 pm
David H. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:14 pm
A Slate article by David Gans makes much of the fact that business groups haven’t stood up to support Hobby Lobby’s religious exemption claims: This spring, the Supreme Court will decide — for the first time in our nation’s history — whether secular, for-profit corporations are entitled to invoke the constitutional guarantee of the free exercise of religion. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:59 am
” And at Slate, David Gans argues that, “[a]part from a few isolated briefs from companies just like Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood, the U.S. business community offered no support for the claim that secular, for-profit corporations are persons that can exercise religion. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:55 am
At the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History blog, David H. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 6:51 am
Michael McConnell, David Gans, and Jeffrey Rosen discuss the cases and issues in a podcast for the National Constitution Center, while Beverly Mann does the same in a post at Angry Bear. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:57 am
” David L. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:58 am
At the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History blog, David H. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 3:04 pm
At the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, David Gans summarizes the argument – made in a CAC amicus brief – that the Court should not recognize constitutional protection for a corporation’s free exercise of religion. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
Gans responds to Hasen, criticizing what he characterizes as Hasen’s “faulty originalism. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 4:35 am
” The National Constitution Center’s Jeffrey Rosen spoke with David Gans and Ilya Shapiro about the case; that interview is available in a podcast. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:08 am
Contrary to David Gans’ claim, I do not think it is the case that business corporations cannot have religious purposes. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:50 pm
(Will Baude) I’ve seen some skeptical responses to my previous post about corporations and free exercise, of which Dahlia Lithwick’s and David Gans’s are emblematic. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:59 am
Elsewhere, at the Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC), David H. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:38 am
At the Constitutional Accountability Center, David H. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 7:47 am
In an op-ed for the Austin American Statesman, David Gans discusses Fisher v. [read post]
