Search for: "David Hart QC"
Results 1 - 20
of 103
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2017, 9:06 am
ICYMI: David Pannick, I Have To Move My Car: Tales of Unpersuasive Advocates and Injudicious Judges (Hart Publishing, 2008).There are law books about constructive trusts, the Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 1964 and the rule in Foss v Harbottle. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 9:06 am
ICYMI: David Pannick, I Have To Move My Car: Tales of Unpersuasive Advocates and Injudicious Judges (Hart Publishing, 2008).There are law books about constructive trusts, the Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 1964 and the rule in Foss v Harbottle. [read post]
10 May 2012, 2:33 am
As David Hart QC identifies in his blog, Is climate change a human rights issue? [read post]
28 May 2015, 4:11 am
For some years in the early and mid 2000s, a routine form of news-gathering in the Mirror Group was phone hacking – listening to voicemails left for celebrities by their friends, and then dishing up revelations in their papers. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 2:59 am
Kennedy v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 4:39 pm
The case of C (A Child) ([2016] EWCA Civ 798) is is the most recent in the long series of legal steps touching on the violent career of Ben Butler, recently convicted of the murder of his daughter, Ellie. [read post]
16 May 2017, 4:30 pm
In the case of R (o.t.a P & others) v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:00 am
The case of Dr DB v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm
For some years there has been debate between the judges about whether anonymity orders should be made when very seriously injured people’s claims are settled and the court is asked to approve the settlement. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:11 am
In the case of Kennedy v Chairty Commission ([2014] UKSC 20), in judgments running to 90 pages, the Supreme Court dismissed this appeal by Mr Kennedy, a Times journalist, for access to documents generated by the Charity Commission under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 4:20 pm
On 30 March 2015, the Upper Tribunal gave judgment in the case of Department of Health v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
It was David Hart QC who wrote the excellent summary!) [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 8:00 am
August 3, 2012 David Hart QC Filed under: Roundup [read post]
7 May 2009, 1:12 am
David Pannick QC has always been much more interested in unpersuasive advocates and injudicious judges. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 12:40 am
David Hart QC also discusses the judgment on the UKHRB here. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am
See David Hart QC’s post. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:16 am
David Hart QC explains the CA’s reasoning in his post on the UKHRB, noting the instrumental role played by the Supreme Court (SC) judgment in Sugar v BBC (see also Adam Wagner’s post on this). [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:05 pm
Writing before the decision of the Court of Appeal in ZXC v Bloomberg LP [2020] EWCA Civ 611, Professor David Rolph commented in his illuminating chapter on the case in Landmark Cases in Defamation Law (Hart Publishing, 2019), ‘the policy of the law has decisively changed. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 4:28 pm
We had a case note about this decision and there were comments from interveners Open Rights Group. from Paul Bernal and on the UK Human Rights Blog (David Hart QC). [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:00 pm
25th June 2012 David Hart QC Filed under: Roundup Tagged: human rights [read post]
