Search for: "David Luban" Results 1 - 20 of 199
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Scott Cummings is Robert Henigson Professor of Legal Ethics and Professor of Law at UCLA School of Law and David Luban is a University Professor and Professor of Law and Philosophy at Georgetown Law. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Malcolm Jorgensen
Non-American legal policymakers unconvinced by the U.S. capacity for self-accountability likely agree with David Luban’s argument that the PTC decision “simply rewards the U.S. for its open hostility to the ICC” while encouraging similarly situated states to follow suit. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
” At Take Care, David Gans asserts that Rucho v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 8:07 am by Rick Garnett
I first discovered his work during my second year of law school, when I was in a (great) seminar taught by David Luban on "The Legal Profession. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Canadian Forum on Civil Justice
Paraphrasing what David Luban has concluded about the U.S. context, providing equal access to legal services would take more money than governments are willing to spend on the poor (Lawyers and Justice: An Ethical Study, Princeton, 1988. p. 240). [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:34 am by Diane Marie Amann
And as shown in that issue’s table of contents, additional contributors included many whom Judge Wald’s life and work had touched: Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Harvard Law Dean Martha Minow, along with Kelly Askin, Karima Bennoune, Doris Buss, Naomi Cahn, Margaret deGuzman, Katharine Gelber, Laurie Green, Nienke Grossman, Rachel Harris, Dina Francesca Haynes, Jennifer Leaning, David Luban, Rama Mani, Jenny Martinez, Fionnuala Ní Aoláin,… [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 5:51 am by Marty Lederman
  As many scholars have long explained (including my colleagues Greg Klass and David Luban, as well as, more recently, Eugene Volokh and Will Baude), Justice Alito is right that "Abood was poorly reasoned"--but in the other direction. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 1:52 pm
After Kant, because human animals alone have dignity they can make necessary and compelling or objective claims on each other (hence reciprocal notions of ‘obligation’ or ‘duty’ and ‘right’), and thus our actions are capable of embodying or expressing the “motive” proper to morality, one that also accounts for the (rational) recognition of the objective worth of others as “ends in themselves. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Balkinization, Marty Lederman and David Luban weigh in on the government’s cert petition in Hargan v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 11:21 am by Legal Profession Prof
The issue features the work of David Luban & Bradley Wendel, Laurel S. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed at The Hill, David Luban argues that “[t]he irony is that filing frivolous accusations with the Supreme Court is itself an ethics violation — and DOJ’s accusations against Jane Doe’s lawyers come perilously close to crossing that line. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:20 am by David Markus
Speaking of the Boies law firm, David Boies is in a little bit of hot water. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Michel Paradis
And as David Luban wrote yesterday on the Just Security, “No defense lawyer could competently represent a client under those circumstances, and incompetent representation is itself unethical. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 8:04 pm
And at "Just Security," David Luban has a post titled "Indefensible: Why Guantanamo defense lawyers can't ethically participate any longer. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:00 am by Alice Woolley
Other scholars, most notably David Luban, accept constraints of legality, but also insist that lawyers’ actions are limited by the norms of ordinary morality. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:19 am by Quinta Jurecic
Perhaps the most prescient voice on this side of the debate was that of David Luban, who made the point in Just Security that it is all too easy for our moral footing to slip without our noticing as we become acclimated to new circumstances that would previously have been appalling. [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:21 am by Jack Goldsmith
The New York Times’s story on “What It Means to Work for Trump,” on top of Jim Comey’s firing last week, got me thinking again about how difficult it is for a lawyer who is a political appointee to act with integrity in the Trump administration. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 3:30 am by W. Bradley Wendel
Bradley Wendel David Luban and I just finished a paper celebrating the 30th anniversary of the Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics. [read post]