Search for: "David M. Brown"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,331
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am
Tribe Carl M. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Richard M. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 5:32 am
Cate Brown reports for the Washington Post. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 7:55 am
’ -- Jan M. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Gregory, Sidley Austin LLP, on Saturday, October 7, 2023 Tags: Artificial intelligence, Board of Directors, Corporate governance, R&D What’s Next for Diversity Shareholder Proposals Posted by David A. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Gregory, Sidley Austin LLP, on Saturday, October 7, 2023 Tags: Artificial intelligence, Board of Directors, Corporate governance, R&D What’s Next for Diversity Shareholder Proposals Posted by David A. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 6:44 pm
Elizabeth Steiner, Oregon District 17Chair Jessica Vega Pederson, Multnomah County*David Anderson, NW NaturalMonique Claiborne, Greater Portland, IncGraciela Cowger, Schwabe*Shea Flaherty Betin, Prosper PortlandRobert Gootee, Moda Health*Stephen Green, Business for a Better Portland*Nkenge Harmon Johnson, The Urban League*Andrew Hoan, Portland Metro Chamber*Renee James, Ampere*Rachel Langford, Home ForwardCobi Lewis, Micro Enterprise Services of Oregon*Rob O'Neill, Moss AdamsLance… [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm
David G. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
David Boyle, Snapchat’s Senior Director of Products, stated in his Declaration that he was not sure whether his company would be regulated by Act 689. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:11 pm
Recently, two lawyers wrote an article in a legal trade magazine about excluding epidemiologic evidence in civil litigation.[1] The article was wildly wide of the mark, with several conceptual and practical errors.[2] For starters, the authors discussed Rule 702 as excluding epidemiologic studies and evidence, when the rule addresses the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am
An issue that came up during a terrific panel that I participated in last Thursday—organized by the Federalist Society’s Regulatory Transparency Project—was whether age-verification laws for social-media use infringed on a First Amendment right of either adults or minors to receive speech anonymously. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 9:30 pm
" David Beito on that 14th Amendment, Section 3 Argument and the Debs precedent (The Hill). [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm
" Act 689 is Not Narrowly Tailored The Court first considers the Supreme Court's narrow-tailoring analysis in Brown v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
ENTER: Darrell M. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
ENTER: Darrell M. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
The participants, selected from a large applicant pool representing all six law schools in the Historically Black Colleges and Universities Law School Consortium (HBCULSC), are: Jai’Ehir Jackson-Hawkins and Veronica Alba, Florida A&M University College of Law Morigan Tuggle, Lauren Fleming and Favour Okhuevbie, Howard University School of Law Zaria Graham and Larry Futrell, North Carolina Central University School of Law Qwantaria Russell, Tatiyana Brown-Harper, Skylar… [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 2:21 pm
David M . [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 2:18 am
Edith M. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 1:06 pm
Judge Jeffrey M. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
I’m not sure the doctrine has improved on the merits, but Nebraska is a bit more comprehensible. [read post]
