Search for: "David M. Goldstein" Results 41 - 60 of 188
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2020, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
” [Kevin Quealy and Eliza Shapiro, New York Times; Dana Goldstein and Jugal K. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 7:27 pm by Jeffrey M. Goldstein
Schulenburg United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division January 6, 2020, Decided; January 6, 2020, Filed CASE NO. 4:18-CV-00508; CASE NO. 4:18-CV-02094)   For [FRANCHISEE] David Scott Levaton, LEAD ATTORNEY, Franchise Legal Support, Westlake Village, CA; Rares M. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from David Savage for the Los Angeles Times, who reports that “[m]uch of corporate America had joined in support of Apple and argued that such broad antitrust claims should be blocked at the starting gate. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
” For The Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports that “[w]hile serving on the U.S. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 9:45 am
"I'm telling you it's so thick up there, there's no way, there's no way you could see somebody laying there," said Pennsylvania State Trooper David Beohm, who also floated the idea that Longenecker had a heart attack before the bulldozer ran over him. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Atlantic, David Graham looks into questions about the credit-card debt revealed on Kavanaugh’s financial-disclosure forms and “how he paid the debt off so quickly. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:06 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Daily Journal (subscription required), David Boyle looks at National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” Eliana Johnson reports at Politico that among the reported front-runners, “[m]uch of the jockeying has centered on D.C. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “[m]illions of workers routinely sign such arbitration agreements unknowingly, only to find out later that they are barred from collective action. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Adam Liptak for The New York Times, Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Andrew Chung at Reuters, and David Savage for the Los Angeles Times, who reports that “[m]ost of the justices said they were not interested in ruling broadly. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court, Justice Neil M. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:01 am
Geis (University of Virginia), on Friday, March 23, 2018 Tags: Accounting, Beneficial owners, Blockchain, Boards of Directors, Class actions, Clearing houses, Corporate liability, Financial technology, Misconduct, Ownership, Securities litigation, Shareholder rights, Shareholder suits, Shareholder voting Corporations and the Culture Wars Posted by David A. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
For the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh explains how “the math community is responding, belatedly, to an invitation from Justice Anthony M. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr reports that “[m]embers of the U.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 7:18 am
"“The appearance of this work should be provocative,” said [deputy director and chair of the modern art department Ann] Goldstein. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am by Andrew Hamm
Given that, we’re pleased to have the chance to ask you, and now David, the questions for a change. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
For the Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports that the whistleblower in this case “faces a stiff challenge based on ‘textualism,’ the approach that has won favor with most of the justices, and none more so than new Justice Neil M. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary comes from David Alan Sklansky at Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case.] [read post]