Search for: "David McDonald" Results 301 - 320 of 823
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Plenary Session: Measuring Consumer Confusion in Trademark InfringementFacilitator: Barton Beebe (NYU) Lanham Act: confusion is vaguely defined. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 9:57 am by Giles Peaker
I did a seminar on tenancy deposits, with David Smith, also of NL and Philippa Graham. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 10:03 pm by News Desk
July 28: OSI President David McDonald updates the public, saying that the company want to rebuild the “trust and respect of our customers. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 2:45 pm by Bill Marler
  Bill’s articles include “Separating the Chaff from the Wheat: How to Determine the Strength of a Foodborne Illness Claim”, “Food Claims and Litigation”, “How to Keep Your Focus on Food Safety”, and “How to Document a Food Poisoning Case” (co-authored with David Babcock.) [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 7:20 am by Joe May
“Franchise owners flock to DC in defense of McDonald’s” by Ben Goad in The Hill. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 8:00 pm by David McDonald
by David McDonald When an employee announces that he or she is resigning in order to go work for a competitor, it is only natural for an employer to become anxious—particularly when the departing employee has access to the business’s confidential information. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:10 pm
Richardson, The Evolving Marketscape of Climate Finance David M. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:31 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
McDonald (Deceased) v National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc, heard 12 – 13 February 2014. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:37 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
McDonald (Deceased) v National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc, heard 12 – 13 February 2014. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
McDonald (Deceased) v National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc, heard 12 – 13 February 2014. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 5:21 am
Obviously, if companies like McDonald’s are willing to offer, for an eight-year Olympic sponsorship, close to US$200 million, there is a clear expectation that this investment will be protected. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 11:47 pm
In his most recent post in our debate over the Hobby Lobby decision, David Post suggests that it surely can’t be the case that a publicly traded corporation can “exercise religion”: I take it that the “no reification” position applies equally to public corporations – imposing an obligation on McDonalds, Inc. is just imposing it on each of its owners. [read post]