Search for: "David Udell" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2011, 8:30 am by Jim Greiner
Our great thanks to David Udell and to Bob Sable for taking the time to comment (separately) on our paper, “What Difference Representation? [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:18 am by Legal Talk Network
Guests James Sandman, president emeritus of the Legal Services Corporation; David Udell, executive director of the National Center for Access to Justice (NCAJ); and Logan Cornett, director of research at the Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System (IAALS), join LSC Emerging Leaders Council member Jason Tashea to offer their perspectives on the importance of data collection for increasing access to justice. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 9:20 am by Richard Zorza
David Udell Executive Director National Center for Access to Justice 55 Fifth Avenue, Room 907 New York, NY 10003 T: 212-790-0869 E: udell@yu.edu www.ncforaj.org Richard Zorza Zorza Associates 3097 Ordway St. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:15 am by Richard Zorza
David Udell and Richard Zorza Note: One paragraph of this post was modified on Friday June 24. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 11:02 am
The Fort Wayne News-Sentinel is carrying an AP story by Emily Udell, headlined "Courtroom camera effort stalls. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:04 am by David Udell
David Udell is the Executive Director of the National Center for Access to Justice and a Visiting Professor from Practice at Cardozo Law School. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 5:49 am by Ezra Rosser
Rogers, and its implications for access to justice, is the subject of an on-line symposium that had 20 invited panelist experts, at ConcurringOpinions.Com, co-hosted by David Udell of the National Center for Access to Justice at Cardozo Law School, and Richard Zorza of www.accesstojustice.net. [read post]
23 May 2011, 3:57 pm by Jaya Ramji-Nogales
  Two experts in residence will moderate:  Richard Zorza, expert in self-represented litigation and blogger at Access to Justice, and David Udell, Director of the National Center for Access to Justice. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 10:00 pm
The Brennan Center Legal Series and its Steering Committee Members Michael Waldman (Brennan Center for Justice), Jim Johnson (Brennan Center board chair, Debevoise & Plimpton) Michele Balfour, Jeremy Creelan (Jenner & Block), Beth Golden, Professor Helen Hershkoff (NYU School of Law), Daniel Kolb (Davis Polk & Wardwell), Edward Labaton (Labaton Sucharow), Lawrence Pedowitz (Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz), Roy Reardon (Simpson Thacher & Bartlett), Lee… [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:31 pm by Jon Levitan
 Additional coverage comes from David Savage of the Los Angeles Times; Bill Mears of Fox News;  and Nina Totenberg and Domenico Montanaro of NPR. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, David Leonhardt warns that “[a]bsent some kind of course correction, the [Supreme C]ourt risks a crisis of legitimacy. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
En una conferencia realizada en la Escuela de Derecho de la Universidad de Puerto Rico, Udell agregó que es importante que se pueda evaluar la ejecución de los tribunales con respecto a la accesibilidad por parte de personas de bajos recursos. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 8:00 am by Adam Faderewski
Udell, 67, of Plainfield, Indiana, died December 27, 2018. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by Richard Zorza
  My co-moderator of this Symposium, David Udell, has not yet been able to add his always highly valuable perspectives to this post. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 8:00 am by Adam Faderewski
Udell, 67, of Plainfield, Indiana, died December 27, 2018. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 4:38 am by Renee Newman Knake
  The panel will be moderated by Peter Joy (Washington University), and the featured speakers are Adam Liptak (New York Times Supreme Court Correspondent) and David Udell (Cardozo Law, Director of the National Center for Access to Justice). [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 1:21 am by Kevin LaCroix
Chief Judge David Sentelle concurred in part and dissented in part, noting that he would have affirmed the length of the disbarment. [read post]