Search for: "Davidson v. Davidson" Results 121 - 140 of 854
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2021, 11:21 am by Karen Gullo
“It’s outrageous and wrong for Georgia to try to dismiss the flaws in the voting system as ‘glitches,’” said Davidson. [read post]
30 May 2021, 8:57 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Davidson, 1989 CanLII 92 (SCC), [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1038, at p. 1078, per Lamer J. [read post]
14 May 2021, 5:30 am by Kevin
The introduction to the Federal Court of Australia’s opinion in Universal Music Publishing v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 8:28 am by Sam Cohen, Alex Vivona
Testing Taiwan On March 26, Taiwan’s Ministry of National Defense reported the incursion of 20 Chinese military aircraft in Taiwan’s southwest air defense identification zone (ADIZ). [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 1:06 pm by Phil Dixon
The two were charged with second-degree murder and voluntary manslaughter following an altercation with Molly’s husband in Davidson County. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Sean Quirk
Article V obligates U.S. support in an armed attack against “territories under the administration of Japan. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 3:34 pm by David Greene
This blog post was co-written by EFF Legal Fellow Houston Davidson. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm by Series of Essays
OECD Evaluation of EU Regulatory Policies January 20, 2020 | Christiane Arndt-Bascle, Paul Davidson, Benjamin Gerloff, and Rebecca Schultz, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development has assessed all European Union countries’ use of stakeholder engagement, regulatory impact assessment, and ex post evaluation to improve the quality of laws and regulations, drawing on its composite indicators of regulatory policy and… [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]