Search for: "Davis v. McKinney"
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2008, 10:53 am
McKinney, No. 07-20184 (5th Cir. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 7:15 pm
In Wayne David v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:37 am
Clabourne v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:18 pm
By Lee DavisState of Tennessee v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:10 am
McKinney v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
McKinney, 361 N.C. 53 (2006) (remanding case to trial court for determination of whether warrant was valid notwithstanding warrant application’s inclusion of information gained in unlawful search) and State v. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 8:12 am
McKinney v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:11 pm
” McKinney v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:35 am
Higgitt, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3211:22). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am
Moreover, where a trial court sets a specific deadline for expert disclosure, it has the discretion, pursuant to CPLR 3126, to impose appropriate sanctions if a party fails to comply with the deadline (see MacDonald v Leif, 89 AD3d 995; Pirro Group, LLC v One Point St., Inc., 71 AD3d 654; Bomzer v Parke-Davis, 41 AD3d 522; Maiorino v City of New York, 39 AD3d 601) . [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 5:00 am
McKinney Properties, No. 2017-0022 (C.P. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:36 pm
McKinney v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:51 am
There is still more commentary on Monday’s decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 10:17 pm
National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2004-1 v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 3:28 am
Wagner Davis' assertion of a retaining lien is discussed in connection with plaintiffs' motion to compel infra. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:51 am
For Capitol Media Services (via the Arizona Capitol Times), Howard Fischer reports that in McKinney v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 3:54 am
Davis and capital resentencing case McKinney v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 11:44 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Nathan McKinney v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 5:57 am
Reuben Clark Law School The Reports of My Death Are Greatly Exaggerated: The Continued Vitality of Worcester v. [read post]
