Search for: "Davis v Zeh" Results 1 - 1 of 1
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2023, 3:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Reargument was therefore properly granted because Supreme Court (McBride, J.) misapplied the controlling law in finding that plaintiff, without an expert affidavit, had sufficiently raised a question of fact (see Davis v Zeh, 200 AD3d 1275, 1280 [3d Dept 2021]; Cascade Bldrs. [read post]