Search for: "Davis v. Alaska" Results 1 - 20 of 82
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Davis, Jr., Alaska Legal Services Corporation, Anchorage, and Deepak Gupta, Public Citizen Litigation Group, Washington, D.C., have won an important victory for consumer rights not only in Alaska but across the nation as debt collector attorneys have increasingly sought to cloak their unfair practices with petition rights' immunities. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 2:30 pm by National Indian Law Library
* United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin featured: Davis v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 3:45 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Davis (Jurisdiction; Defamation) State Courts Bulletin Tribe of Florida v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 5:57 am by Viking
Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673 (1986), and Davis v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:11 am by Kali Borkoski
Our contributors include: Roderick Hills, New York University Carissa Hessick, Arizona State University Kevin Johnson, University California, Davis Larry Joseph, Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund Hope Lewis, Northeastern University Richard Samp, Washington Legal Foundation Ilya Shapiro, Cato Institute Rogers Smith, University of Pennsylvania Peter Spiro, Temple University Margret Stock, University of Alaska, Anchorage & Lane Powell PC Carol Swain, Vanderbilt… [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 10:36 am
Robert Boochever, Supreme Court of Alaska, 1973-1974 (later Ninth Circuit judge) Held spots on many nonprofit boards, presidencies (Appellate Defenders and Federal Defenders of San Diego and Habeas Corpus Resource Center)California Lawyer Magazine Lawyer of the Year, 2004-AppellateDistinguished service awards from at least seven bar and community service organizationsSan Diego Legal Professional of the Year (2002)UC Davis: BA (1969 highest honors) J.D. (1973 coif/Law… [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:47 pm by Kurt Carroll
In the last thirty years or so, since the Supreme Court published its 1978 opinion in Oliphant v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 5:00 am by Marissa Miller
Van Arsdall, and Davis v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:25 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Texas Rule of Evidence 609(d) provides that Evidence of juvenile adjudications is not admissible, except for proceedings conducted pursuant to Title III, Family Code, in which the witness is a party, under this rule unless required to be admitted by... [read post]