Search for: "Davis v. Bandemer" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2019, 10:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
The justices further concluded that the Court should overrule Davis v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 8:12 am by Derek T. Muller
Bandemer) or the First Amendment (Justice Kennedy's suggested alternative constitutional provision for assessing partisan gerrymandering claims in Vieth v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:23 pm by Kate Howard
The petition of the day is: Gill v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 1:55 pm by Benjamin Battles
In so doing, the court overruled—without acknowledgement—a six-justice majority’s holding in Davis v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:32 am by Justin Riemer
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, aptly described by the chief justice “as a Justice with extensive experience in state and local politics,” recognized this fact almost 40 years ago, writing in Davis v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 11:24 am by Rick Esenberg
” In 1986, after years of confused and contradictory litigation in the lower courts, the Supreme Court affirmed the possibility of political-gerrymandering claims in Davis v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 10:27 am by Rick Hasen
The Court first found these claims to be actionable in Davis v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:04 am
Bandemer: [T]here is good reason to think that political gerrymandering is a self-limiting enterprise. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am by Chris Winkelman and Philip Gordon
Bandemer, although the court sidestepped an earlier opportunity to address the question in 1932 in Wood v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 2:05 pm by John Phillippe
Plaintiffs hoped it would eliminate the need for the difficult proof described in Davis v. [read post]