Search for: "Davis v. Chicago Housing Authority" Results 1 - 20 of 67
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2009, 12:06 am
Bryant, although the internet citation of Ashmore v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:34 am by Orin Kerr
The police in Jardines could reasonably and lawfully walk up to the front door of the house in that case to knock on the door and ask to speak to the residents. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago, in which the justices will decide whether appellate time limits are jurisdictional, and National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
Davis Security Service was filed based on an incident in East Chicago, Indiana, that occurred on August 7, 2010 when a security officer employed by a company that was hired to provide security for the housing complex shot a woman whom he had previously dated after the two had an argument that appeared to be related to personal issues between them. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
Reclamation by the Cambodian people in recent years of looted cultural property--specifically ancient statues housed both in American museums and offered for sale at a New York auction house--has been a bright spot set against the backdrop of an otherwise dark past, Davis told conference attendees.She called on nations to join relevant international agreements on cultural property protection, to close borders to close to undocumented cultural objects from… [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:50 am
" Stevens leaves a diverse legal legacy, authoring landmark decisions ranging from Reno v ACLU, the 1997 decision that anointed the internet with broad First Amendment protection, to Chevron v Natural Resources Defense Council [1984], which has guided the administrative state ever since. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:16 am by Emma Snell
Some 90% of housing has been damaged by the fighting, Stryuk said. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am by Marie Louise
ITC (ITC 337 Update) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Stay pending reissue: Timing and blog reliability: Tyco Fire Products v Victaulic (Patently-O) District Court E D Texas: Defense win on fringement & invalidity in Judge Davis’ court: Alcatel-Lucent v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In this setting, states and cities argue that the anti-commandeering principle prevents the feds from requiring state and local authorities to affirmatively provide information about or access to individuals who may have committed immigration law violations.Perhaps the most important Supreme Court case on this point is Printz v. [read post]