Search for: "Davis v. Davis (INMATE 1)" Results 81 - 100 of 104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
Ward, 21-439: (1) Whether an inmate’s as-applied method-of-execution challenge must be raised in a habeas petition instead of through a 42 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 3:46 am
Oregon Dept. of Agriculture, #07-474, 128 S.Ct. 2146 (2008).Davis v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 5:15 am by Edith Roberts
Davis, next week’s case involving a Texas death row inmate who “is asking the Court to void his death sentence and order a new sentencing hearing because the jury heard testimony that Buck, a black man, was more dangerous than he would have been if he had been white. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Davis, No. 07-10177 An Anders motion to withdraw as counsel by defendant's federal public defender is denied without prejudice where: 1) counsel's Acquaye statement did not indicate that he had consulted with the United States Attorney's Office (USAO) as to defendant's case; 2) there was no indication that the USAO will enforce the appellate waiver; and 3) counsel could not simply rely on the USAO's statement that they will enforce the appeal waiver in all… [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:24 am by Lyle Denniston
Eight years later, in Davis v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Angus McCullough QC
Then, last month, the Daily Mail took up the story and ignited the public debate which had until then been lacking (as noted in Adam Wagner’s post here on 1 March 2012). [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:50 pm
Case # 05-1991-CF-007249-AXXX-XX lilrm~ril~l~1ililllllli""'""11/11111" 1/11 010734194 State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:49 am by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 9 November 2015, HHJ Stephen Davies handed down judgment in the case of Oyston v Ragozzino [2015] EWHC 3232 (QB). [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
Following the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights on 6 October 2005 that the UK's current ban on all serving prisoners from voting contravenes Article 3 of Protocol No 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights, the Government decided to publish a consultation document on options for a change in policy. [read post]