Search for: "Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries" Results 1 - 20 of 60
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2016, 3:33 am by Robin Shea
Department of Labor would have seriously infringed on the attorney-client relationship. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 11:58 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
Davis, 126 F.3d 112, 119 (2d Cir. 1997) (holding that an intern who did not receive compensation or benefits was not entitled to protection under Title VII); Evans v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 12:40 pm
She then went to law school at UC Davis, where she graduated in the top five percent of her class and as a member of the Order of the Coif. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 4:46 pm
Decisions of interest concerning Labor and Employment Law Source: Justia November 25, 2011 Barry v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:02 am by Terry Hart
In fact, ‘the primary object in conferring the monopoly lie[s] in the general benefits derived by the public from the labors of authors.’” [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:56 am by Kathy Kapusta
Reviving her suit for a second time, the appeals court reversed summary judgment and remanded (Davis v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 2:13 pm by Tammy Binford
“The Department of Labor always prefers actual time records, not estimates,” Whitney said. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am by Kiera Flynn
SmithKline Beecham Corp.Docket: 11-204Issue(s): (1) Whether deference is owed to the Secretary of Labor's interpretation of the Fair Labor Standards Act's outside sales exemption and related regulations; and (2) whether the Fair Labor Standards Act's outside sales exemption applies to pharmaceutical sales representatives.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Cir.)Petition for certiorariAmicus brief of U.S. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, 18-547 Issues: (1) Whether Oregon violated the free speech and free exercise clauses of the First Amendment by compelling the Kleins to design and create a custom wedding cake to celebrate a same-sex wedding ritual in violation of their sincerely held religious beliefs; (2) whether the Supreme Court should overrule Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 10:01 pm by Neil Cahn
On May 23, 2012, the Appellate Division, Second Department, in Bershadskaya v. [read post]