Search for: "Davis v. Green" Results 1 - 20 of 462
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2024, 8:45 am by CMS
In this post, Sarah Coates-Madden, Senior Associate at CMS, and Fiona Dalling, Associate at CMS, preview the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Davies v Bridgend County Borough Council. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 5:19 am by Frank Cranmer
  Quick links Cloisters Chambers: Discrimination, belief and the “fundamental party rights”: the judgment in Ali v Green Party of England and Wales (i.e. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am by Josh Blackman
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:37 am by JURIST Staff
Furthermore, it was held in Davis v United States (8th Cir. 1917) that a public trial is broadly defined as a trial at which the public is free to attend. [read post]
Victorian Greens Upper House Member for Parliament, Katherine Copsey referred to the decision as “a win for climate and green transport. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
Surveillance 65 parliamentarians, including David Davis MP, Caroline Lucas MP, Baroness Shami Chakrabati, Joanna Cherry KC MP and Sir Ed Davey MP, have called for an immediate stop to the use of live facial recognition for surveillance purposes, Big Brother Watch reports. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Davis (Assistant Professor, The University of Alabama), Brendan Nyhan (James O. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am by INFORRM
Andrew Green KC, who represents the Mirror, suggested that although the company’s journalists hacked the voicemails of numerous celebrities during the 2000s, there was no evidence that the Duke of Sussex was also target. [read post]