Search for: "Davis v. Hayes"
Results 1 - 20
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2018, 3:55 am
Hayes Holderness (Richmond), Darien Shanske (UC-Davis) & David Gamage (Indiana), Brief of Tax Law Professors as Amici Curiae in Support of the Department of Revenue of the State of Colorado in Department of Revenue of the State of Colorado v. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 5:12 am
Davies, (Not Yet) Taking Rights Seriously: The House of Lords in Begum v. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 12:32 pm
In Hayes v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 7:50 am
Hayes Holderness Assistant Professor University of Richmond School of Law As covered in earlier posts (here, here, here, and here), the Supreme Court is currently considering the case of South Dakota v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 11:00 am
Davis, 2016 U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
Loving v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 10:32 am
ROBERTS v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 12:32 am
While the Supreme Court has held that fingerprint evidence—evidence the dissent describes as "paradigmatic identity evidence" (dissenting op at 389)—may be subject to the exclusionary rule (Davis v Mississippi, 394 US 721, 724 [1969]), Davis, as well as Hayes v Florida (470 US 811, 815 [1985]), is distinguishable from this case in two ways. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:17 pm
Davis (argue)Improper eyewitness ID instructionFailure to give limiting instruction re: gang evidenceMarch 6--Thursday--a.m.State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 10:00 am
Simpson Tate, George Hayes. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:38 am
See Davis v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 4:43 am
Jaslow and Lotus v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 6:59 am
Ct. 1643 (1985) and Davis v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:01 am
Davis, announced that the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause protected only against provably intentional race discrimination; and Cruikshank, not the Civil Rights Cases or City of Boerne v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 5:51 pm
Davis v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 1:22 pm
Hayes; affirming Judge Patton's suppression order under MarxKargus v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 9:20 am
[w]hat one purchaser may rely upon in entering into a contract may not be material to another purchaser”) First District Court of Appeal Davis v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 4:29 pm
The SEC case is Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:04 pm
Avgiris, Comment, Huddle up: surveying the playing field on the single entity status of the National Football League in anticipation of American Needle v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:55 am
’In February of 2015, Kitzhaber resigned from office, surrounded by controversy over whether he had used his position to benefit his fiancée, Cylvia Hayes. [read post]
