Search for: "Davis v. Kelley" Results 1 - 20 of 63
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2022, 12:45 am by INFORRM
However, unlike Sterritt, Kelley (@danielmakelley on Twitter) is now apparently a reformed character, seeking to pursue a legitimate cyber security career (Computer Weekly, 18 June 2022). 5. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
The Sun newspaper has been accused in court documents of illegally conducting phone hacking, targeting phones of Prince Harry and Chelsy Davy. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 6:20 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Wednesday, April 10, 2019 Tags: Accountability, No-action letters, Public interest, SEC, Securities regulation, Transparency Executive Long-Term Incentive Plans Posted by Joseph Kieffer, Equilar Inc., on Thursday, April 11, 2019 Tags: Compensation ratios, Equity-based compensation, Executive Compensation, Incentives, Management, Pay for performance The SEC v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
Callahan, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, on Friday, July 20, 2018 Tags: Janus Capital v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:21 pm
Jones–Kelley, 675 F.3d 580, 583 (6th Circuit 2012). [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:02 am
Jackson, Harvard Law School, on Saturday, April 22, 2017 Tags: Accountability, Bank boards, Banks, Boards of Directors, CFPB, Compliance & ethics, Consumer protection, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Incentives, Misconduct, Oversight, Proxy advisors, Risk oversight, Shareholder voting, Wells Fargo Assessing Financial Advisor Compensation Disclosure Following Vento v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
Sandoz Inc., 15-1195), and cases involving trial before nonlawyer judges (Davis v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 256 F.3d 1013, 1021 (10th Cir. 2001) (wrong to “construe [a treater’s] ‘heeding’ an adequate warning to mean [s/he] would have given the warning”) (applying Oklahoma law); In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 480, 490-91 (N.J. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:35 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Panelists: Bill Hearn, Davis LLP Canadian SCt decided Richard v. [read post]